Solve Series Difficulty: \sum^{n}_{k=1} kx^{k} & \sum^{n}_{k=1} k^{2}x^{k}

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chewy0087
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difficulty Series
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the manipulation of series, specifically the sums \(\sum^{n}_{k=1} kx^{k}\) and \(\sum^{n}_{k=1} k^{2}x^{k}\). Participants are exploring how to derive these sums from the known geometric series formula.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss differentiating the geometric series to derive the first sum and express confusion about manipulating the limits of summation. There are attempts to clarify how changing the index affects the series and whether it impacts the original equation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights on changing variables to manipulate the index in the sums. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of starting the index at different values, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention challenges related to the limits of summation and the effects of changing the index, indicating a need for clarity on these aspects. There is also a reference to the difficulty of finding helpful resources on the topic.

Chewy0087
Messages
368
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given that

\sum^{n}_{k=0} x^{k}= \frac{1-x^{n+1}}{1-x}

Obtain a similar result for ;

\sum^{n}_{k=1} kx^{k}
\sum^{n}_{k=1} k^{2}x^{k}

The Attempt at a Solution



Hey, well basically my trouble with this question stems from the manipulation of the limits and the effects that it has on the series itself;

For the first one, I differentiated giving me;

\sum^{n}_{k=1} kx^{k-1}= \frac{x^{n+1}-x^{n}(n+1)+1}{(1-x)^{2}}

Obviously when k<0 it doesn't hold as it would be 0, so I changed it to 1 from 0, and I can then reduce the lower index to 0 to make it into a better form.

However I'm just confused as to how to manipulate the index, and as to whether it would have any effect on the initial RHS equation. I don't seem to be getting the right answer in the way I've done above.

I have looked this up but no-where seems to be very helpful about it...

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Manipulating the index in a sum is as easy as changing variables. If k starts at k=1, then s=k-1 starts at 0. So

<br /> \sum^{n}_{k=1} kx^{k-1} = \sum_{s=0}^{n-1} (s+1) x^s.<br />
 
I have a feeling that it's something to do with discarding the k=0 and so changing to to k=1, and then changing the index back to 0 and doing the same? But that feels like such a cop-out.
 
fzero said:
Manipulating the index in a sum is as easy as changing variables. If k starts at k=1, then s=k-1 starts at 0. So

<br /> \sum^{n}_{k=1} kx^{k-1} = \sum_{s=0}^{n-1} (s+1) x^s.<br />

I feel so stupid, I wasn't reducing the upper limit >.<.

Thanks bud
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K