Solve Spring on Incline: L, x(c), m, g, θ, μ, & k

  • Thread starter Thread starter PascalPanther
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Incline Spring
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a spring on an incline, where participants are tasked with deriving an equation for the length (L) of the incline using variables such as the compression of the spring (x(c)), mass (m), gravitational acceleration (g), angle of the incline (θ), coefficient of friction (μ), and spring constant (k). The context includes forces acting on the mass, energy transformations, and the effects of friction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss free body diagrams (FBDs) and the forces involved, including spring force, gravitational force, and friction. There are attempts to relate energy conservation principles to the problem, with some participants expressing confusion over dimensional inconsistencies and the relationship between different energy forms. Questions arise about the role of friction and how to express height (h) in terms of length (L).

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring different approaches to the problem, with some suggesting that the relationship between height and length needs clarification. There is a recognition that the initial and final energies must be considered, and some guidance has been offered regarding the simplification of equations. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being examined, particularly concerning the role of friction and energy conservation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note constraints such as the inability to use velocity (v) directly in their equations and the challenge of solving for L given the complexity of the equations involved. There is also mention of hints provided in the thread that suggest alternative approaches to the problem.

PascalPanther
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
The situation is as follows:

http://img2.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/a87ac3e9ef.jpg
http://img2.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/a87ac3e9ef.jpg

There is friction, but no friction while in the barrel of the spring gun.

I am suppose to derive an equation to solve for L, using x(c), m, g, theta, mu, and k.

What I did so far:

I did a FBD, I see the following forces:
1. Force of the spring from the spring gun, 2. force of the weight parallel to the plane, 3. force of kinetic friction

U(spring) = 1/2 k*x(c)^2
F(weight) = m*g*sin(theta)
F(friction) = kinetic friction constant* normal force
= mu(k) * m*g*cos(theta)

W=F*s = 1/2 * m*v^2 - 0
F(net) = U - F(w) - F(f)

s = F/W
= [U - F(w) - F(f)] / [(1/2) * m * v^2]
= [(1/2)k*x(c)^2 - (mgsin(theta)) - mu*mgcos(theta))]/ [(1/2)/m*v^2]

Since I can't use v in the equation;
U(spring) = KE = (1/2)k*x^2 = (1/2)m*v^2
v = Sqrt((k*x^2)/m)

L = s
L = [(1/2)k*x(c)^2 - (mgsin(theta)) - mu*mgcos(theta))]/ [(1/2)/m*((k*x^2)/m)]

What did I do wrong here? I think it's more than one thing wrong.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't quite follow what you are doing, but I see some dimensional inconsistencies. For example
F(net) = U - F(w) - F(f)
cannot be. U is an energy and the Fs are forces. These do not add.

You seem to recognize that there is a force in the problem that is going to do work that will take mechanical energy from the mass. That is good. Focus on the mechanical energy. What would happen if there were no friction? What changes when the friction is present?
 
I think I need to start over.

So there should be two different parts to this problem.
First part, is just inside the spring gun barrel:

U(spring) = (1/2)*k*x^2
U(grav) = sin(theta)mg(-x)

KE = U(spring) + U(grav)
(1/2)*m*v^2 = (1/2)*k*x^2 - sin(theta)mgx

v^2= [(k*x^2)/m] - [2*sin(theta)*g*x]
v(1) = Sqrt([(k*x^2)/m] - [2*sin(theta)*g*x])
Which is the velocity as it exits the gun barrel...

After this it is no longer a spring problem.
If there was no friction, I think it will be just:
K(1) + U(1) = K(2) + U(2)

But there is friction so:
K(1) + U(1) + W(other) = K(2) + U(2)
(1/2)*m*v^2 + 0 + W(other) = 0 + U(2)
(1/2)*m*v^2 + W(other) = m*g*h

W(other) = F(friction)*s
F(friction) = mu*N = mu*(m*g*cos(theta))

I'm a bit confused at this part, I think s = L. But I don't know "h" so I can't solve for W(other) to then use to find s... Am I still going about this wrong?
 
You are close. There is a simple relationship between your h and L. Look back at what you did when the block was in the gun.
 
OlderDan said:
You are close. There is a simple relationship between your h and L. Look back at what you did when the block was in the gun.
h is equal to (L+x(c))*sin(theta)? Or is there something else? I don't think I could solve for L if that was the case...
 
It looks to me that your h is the increase in height relative to the end of the gun, so it would be just
h = L*sin(theta)
 
(1/2)*m*v^2 + W(other) = m*g*h

(1/2)*m*v^2 + mu*(m*g*cos(theta))*L = m*g*L*sin(theta)

((1/2)*v^2)/L = -mu*(g*cos(theta)) + g*sin(theta)

L/((1/2)*v^2) = 1/(-mu*(g*cos(theta))) + 1/(g*sin(theta))

L = ((1/2)*v^2)/(-mu*(g*cos(theta))) + ((1/2)*v^2)/(g*sin(theta))

Plugging in how I got v... should get me how to find L?

------
I ended up also looking at the hints for this problem, and it gave me after solving the parts:

E(final) - E(initial) = W(friction)

E(final) = m*g*(L + x)*sin(theta)
E(initial) = (1/2)k*x^2
W(friction) = -k.coeff*(m*g*cos(theta))*L

m*g*(L+x)*sin(theta) - (1/2)k*x^2 = -k.coeff*(m*g*cos(theta))*L

Does my other way sound compatible to this way? Is there even a way to solve for L in the hinted way?
 
Your way was OK, but it was not the most direct way. There was no need to find the velocity at the end of the gun. All that matters is that the differeence between the final gravitaional potential energy and the intial spring potential energy equals the work done against the system by friction. Since you only care about the energies at the beginning and at the end, where the block is not moving, the intermediate velocities are of no concern.
 
Since my first way produces a huge equation, how would I go about moving the L to one side for the second equation? I think I must be missing some algebra trick. I cannot find a way to get (L-x) and L to work.
 
  • #10
PascalPanther said:
Since my first way produces a huge equation, how would I go about moving the L to one side for the second equation? I think I must be missing some algebra trick. I cannot find a way to get (L-x) and L to work.
Expand the term with L+x into two terms using the distributive property. Then group your L terms on one side of the equation and solve for L.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K