Solve Static Equilibrium Problem: Stephen & Wheelbarrow

  • Thread starter Thread starter lizzyb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Static
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a scenario where Stephen is pushing a wheelbarrow over a brick while considering the forces and torques acting on the wheel. The context centers around static equilibrium and the forces involved in lifting the wheel over an obstacle, specifically focusing on the angle of the handles and the downward force applied.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on the wheel, including the force from the brick, the weight of the wheelbarrow, and Stephen's applied force. There is consideration of the ambiguity regarding the downward force of 400 N and whether it includes Stephen's force. Questions arise about the moment arm and how to determine the torque about different points.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring the relationships between the forces and torques involved in the problem. Some suggest focusing on the horizontal component of Stephen's force, while others emphasize the need to consider the geometry of the wheel and the point of contact with the brick. There is no explicit consensus, but various interpretations and approaches are being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may be ambiguous regarding the forces involved and the assumptions that can be made about the downward force applied by Stephen. The discussion includes considerations of the geometry and angles involved in the setup.

lizzyb
Messages
167
Reaction score
0
Someone Else's Previous Q: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=61889
Diagram: http://www.webassign.net/pse/p12-11.gif

I'm using a different edition so some of the numbers are different. I'm doing this to review for the exam (it's not for hw).

Homework Statement



Stephen is pushing his sister Joyce in a wheelbarrow when it is stopped by a brick 8.00 cm high. The handles make an angle of 15.0° from the horizontal. A downward force of 400 N is exerted on the wheel, which has a radius of 20.0 cm.

(a) What force must Stephen apply along the handles to just start the wheel over the brick?

(b) What is the force (magnitude and direction) that the brick exerts on the wheel just as the wheel begins to lift over the brick?

Assume in (a) and (b) that the brick remains fixed and does not slide along the ground.

Homework Equations



I guess just the summation of torque?

The Attempt at a Solution



I made a diagram showing the wheel hitting the brick and Stephen's force against the handlebar.

If I place the origin for determining the torque at the axle of the wheel, how can I determine the moment arm of Stephen's force with the given data?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the wheel is going to climb the brick, the wheel is going to rotate around the point of contact. Consider the forces acting on the wheel.

In my opinion the problem is a bit ambiguous about the force on the wheel. The 400N may or may not include a force Stephen is exerting downward. He has to be lifting the handles as well as pushing forward. My guess is you should only worry about the horizontal force he applies, and assume the 400N downward is constant in the problem. The only upward force to overcome the 400N will be from the brick. The problem with this is that the 15 degrees would not matter.
 
Last edited:
Forces acting on the wheel:
  • Force of brick against wheel (P)
  • Weight of the wheelbarrow (W)
  • Stephen's force pushing the wheelbarrow (F)

So if it's going to rotate about the point of contact, I should take the origin at that place.
 
lizzyb said:
Forces acting on the wheel:
  • Force of brick against wheel (P)
  • Weight of the wheelbarrow (W)
  • Stephen's force pushing the wheelbarrow (F)

So if it's going to rotate about the point of contact, I should take the origin at that place.

Yes.. the geometry of the wheel must be considered to find the relationships among these forces. I just saw the picture at the other link. I need to think a bit more about what the problem is expecting for an answer, but you should be able to find the horizontal component of Stephen's force in any case.
 
Last edited:
For the weight of the wheelbarrow, we have the moment arm d as: [tex]d_{w} = \sqrt{2 r h - h^2}[/tex]. But surely Stephen's force is applicable as torque?

Let phi be the angle from the horizontal the force R (from the brick) makes upon the wheel.

F_x = F cos(15) - R cos(phi) = m a
F_y = R sin(phi) - mg - F sin(15) = 0 (??)

The solution is: (a) 859N, (b) 1040 N left and upward at 36.9 degrees.

Edited/Added

The question (a) states "What force must Stephen apply along the handles to just start the wheel over the brick?"

So if we take the origin as the center of wheel, we don't need to use Stephen's force in determining the torque:

tau = ?
 
Last edited:
OlderDan said:
Yes.. the geometry of the wheel must be considered to find the relationships among these forces. I just saw the picture at the other link. I need to think a bit more about what the problem is expecting for an answer, but you should be able to find the horizontal component of Stephen's force in any case.

OK- I think that they intend for you to neglect the upward force Stephen would be applying before encountering the brick. Part of that force is "along the handles" but you cannot possibly know that force from the information given. I assume they do want you to include the additional downward force (actually a reduction in the upward force) Stephen applies in the torque calculation. So make the assumption that Stephen is pushing both forward and downward at the 15º angle. The net downward force at the wheel axle will be the original 400N plus the added downward component of Stephen's push at 15º, and the horizontal force will be the horizontal component of Stephen's push. Nothing is moving until the wheel starts to lift off the ground, so all forces are balanced.

The torque about the axle is not what determines when the wheel starts to lift. For that you need the torque about the point of contact with the brick. At the axle there is a force that has a horizontal component, caused by stephens pushing and a vertical component caused partly by Stephen's pushing and partly by the original 400N. With gentle to no pushing, the torque about the contact point from the vertical component will be greater than the torque from the horizontal component. As Stephen pushes harder, the torque from the horizontal component will increase faster than that from the vertical component. Eventually, they will become equal and then the wheel will start to lift.
 
lizzyb said:
For the weight of the wheelbarrow, we have the moment arm d as: [tex]d_{w} = \sqrt{2 r h - h^2}[/tex]. But surely Stephen's force is applicable as torque?

Let phi be the angle from the horizontal the force R (from the brick) makes upon the wheel.

F_x = F cos(15) - R cos(phi) = m a
F_y = R sin(phi) - mg - F sin(15) = 0 (??)

The solution is: (a) 859N, (b) 1040 N left and upward at 36.9 degrees.

Edited/Added

The question (a) states "What force must Stephen apply along the handles to just start the wheel over the brick?"

So if we take the origin as the center of wheel, we don't need to use Stephen's force in determining the torque:

tau = ?

Is this your solution or the book's answer? It is correct. The angle phi is the angle the resultant force makes with the horizontal when it is pointing at the axle, which can be determined from the geometry. This is the point at which the torque from the downward force equals the torque from the horizontal force in magnitude.

tau_total = 0 = (400N + Fsin15)(.16m) - Fcos15(.12m)

The .16m is your d_w
 
it is the book's answer; I'm still trying to take what you wrote in. thanks for your help.
 
where is the .12 m from in:

tau_total = 0 = (400N + Fsin15)(.16m) - Fcos15(.12m)

I understand the F cos 15 is the horizontal part of Stephen's push, but where did the moment arm come from?

OOPS / Edit
Sorry - yes, the .12 m = 20 cm - 8 cm.
 
  • #10
got it! thanks! :-)
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K