Solve Summation Problem: \Sigma^{4}_{k=0} \stackrel{1}{k^{2}+1}

  • Thread starter Thread starter Geekchick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Summation
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
Geekchick
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[tex]\Sigma^{4}_{k=0}[/tex] [tex]\stackrel{1}{k^{2}+1}[/tex]

Homework Equations



I would imagine it has something to do with this property

[tex]\Sigma^{n}_{i=1}[/tex] [tex]i^{2}[/tex] = [tex]\stackrel{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



So at first I thought I could bring [tex]k^{2}[/tex]+1 to the top by,

[tex](k^{2}+1)^{-1}[/tex]

However that didn't work.

I do know that I can solve it by

[tex]\stackrel{1}{0^{2}+1}[/tex]+[tex]\stackrel{1}{1^{2}+1}[/tex] and so on and so for so forth but I want to know how to apply the properties.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry I suppose the computer doen't like my problem...I thought i put it in right. If it helps I'll write it out. the problem is,

Sigma with the upper bound being 4 and the lower bound being 0 and the function is one divided by (k squared plus 1)

Hopefully the rest can be figured out...just think of it as a puzzle, lol.
 
yes but I wanted to see how this may apply to the formula [n(n+1)(2n+1)]/6 for any k squared or maybe a different formula I'm not aware of because what if the problem went form 0-150 there is no way anyone would want to work that out the way you did.