Solve the Elevator Jump Problem: 9.8m/s

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MARS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elevator Jump
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the physics of jumping in an elevator that is falling at a constant velocity versus one that is stationary. Participants explore the implications of acceleration and velocity on jump height and perceived weight within the elevator.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that jumping in a free-falling elevator allows a person to hit the ceiling, while questioning the outcome of jumping in an elevator falling at a constant velocity of 50 miles per hour.
  • Another participant corrects the initial post, indicating that the relevant factor is acceleration (9.8 m/s²) rather than velocity, asserting that velocity does not affect jump capacity.
  • A third participant agrees with the notion that if one cannot jump high enough to reach the ceiling in a stationary elevator, the same would apply in a moving elevator, emphasizing the equivalence of the two scenarios.
  • One participant questions the relevance of the speed of 9.8 m/s to the discussion, implying a disconnect in understanding the problem.
  • Another participant argues that it is counterintuitive to be unaware of the elevator's motion at a constant velocity, suggesting an experimental approach using a spring balance to demonstrate consistent weight during steady motion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relevance of velocity versus acceleration in determining jump height in a moving elevator. There is no consensus on the implications of jumping in a falling elevator versus a stationary one.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the importance of distinguishing between constant velocity and acceleration, while others note the potential for intuitive misunderstandings regarding motion in an elevator.

MARS
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Okay, so I know that if you are in a free falling elevator and you jump up you will hit the ceiling, something you could not do in an elevator that was still. But if the elevator was falling at a constant velocity, say 50 miles per hour, when you jump up will you also hit the ceiling because you are falling faster than 9.8m/s or will you jump the same height you did in a still elevator or an elevator moving at a constant velocity less than 9.8m/s? Keep in mind that the elevator is going 50 miles per hour at a constant velocity not accelerating like in a free fall.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean 9.8m/s² ?
The velocity has absolutely no effect on your jump capacity.
It is the acceleration of the elevator that changes you jump capacity.
 
MARS said:
Okay, so I know that if you are in a free falling elevator and you jump up you will hit the ceiling, something you could not do in an elevator that was still. But if the elevator was falling at a constant velocity, say 50 miles per hour, when you jump up will you also hit the ceiling because you are falling faster than 9.8m/s or will you jump the same height you did in a still elevator or an elevator moving at a constant velocity less than 9.8m/s? Keep in mind that the elevator is going 50 miles per hour at a constant velocity not accelerating like in a free fall.

I Agree with maajdl.

You would weigh the same, and if you could not jump high enough to reach the ceiling of the elevator when it was standing still, then you would not be able jump high enough to reach the ceiling when it is moving. The two situations are exactly equivalent. Even the tidal forces would be the same.

In fact, if you did not know whether or not you and the elevator were moving inertially or standing still (i.e. no noise, no rocking, etc.), then from inside the elevator there would be no experiment that you could perform which would allow you to determine that.
 
Last edited:
What makes you think the speed of 9.8 m/s is relevant to that question?
 
It is hard to accept that you would be totally unaware if the lift were traveling downward at uniform velocity - it is not intuitive. This, I think, is because we never (very seldom) actually experience the situation in a form that we recognise. But you can prove it if you take a spring balance and a 1kg mass with you, next time you go in a lift. The mass will register 1kg all the time the lift is moving at steady speed, the 'weight' will change at the start and finish, whilst the lift is accelerating (+ or -). Take a nice long lift journey - like in the Shard or Empire State, where end effects are only a small part of the trip.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K