Solve the Indicial Equation to Show c_1\,=\,c_2\,=\,0

  • Thread starter Thread starter VinnyCee
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on applying the method of Frobenius to solve the indicial equation derived from the second-order differential equation \( z\frac{d^2T}{dx^2} + \frac{z}{x}\frac{dT}{dx} - z y = 0 \). The participants clarify that the indicial equation results in \( r^2 - r = 0 \), yielding roots \( r = 0 \) and \( r = 1 \). However, the correct interpretation shows that both coefficients \( c_1 \) and \( c_2 \) must equal zero, emphasizing the importance of correctly identifying the lowest power in the series expansion. The discussion highlights the necessity of maintaining \( a_0 \neq 0 \) to ensure valid solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the method of Frobenius
  • Familiarity with second-order differential equations
  • Knowledge of series expansions and convergence
  • Basic principles of singular points in differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of Frobenius in detail, focusing on its application to singular points
  • Explore the derivation and implications of the indicial equation in differential equations
  • Learn about series solutions and their convergence criteria in the context of differential equations
  • Investigate the role of coefficients in power series and their significance in determining solutions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and researchers interested in differential equations, particularly those utilizing the method of Frobenius for solving second-order equations.

VinnyCee
Messages
486
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Apply the method of Frobenius to find the roots of the indicial equation to show that [itex]c_1\,=\,c_2\,=\,0[/itex].

The equation in question is a 2nd order DE that was https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=177492".

[tex]z\,\frac{d^2T}{dx^2}\,+\,\frac{z}{x}\,\frac{dT}{dx}\,-\,z\,y\,=\,0[/tex]

If you look at the thread where this equation was derived, we assume that [itex]z\,=\,x^2[/itex].

[tex]x^2\,\frac{d^2T}{dx^2}\,+\,\frac{x^2}{x}\,\frac{dT}{dx}\,-\,x^2\,y\,=\,0[/tex]

Homework Equations



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frobenius_method"

The Attempt at a Solution



There is a regular, singular point at [itex]x_0\,=\,0[/itex]. We seek a solution of the form

[tex]\sum_0^\infty\,a_n\,x^{n\,+\,r}[/tex]

Differentiating that sum twice and substituting into the steady-state heat balance equation above and bringing the x's into the sums

[tex]\sum_0^\infty\,(n\,+\,r)(n\,+\,r\,+1)\,a_n\,x^{n\,+\,r}\,+\,\sum_0^\infty\,(n\,+\,r)\,a_n\,x^{n\,+\,r\,-1}\,-\,\sum_0^\infty\,a_n\,x^{n\,+\,r\,+\,2}\,+\,T_a\,x^2\,=\,0[/tex]

Note the last term, it arises from using [itex]y\,=\,T\,-\,T_a[/itex] from the https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=177492". I really don't know what to do with it, I don't think it is constant, but how do I combine into sums and how do I deal with the constant [itex]T_a[/itex]? I am going to eliminate it, but don't know why!

Now, changing the indicies to combine the summations

[tex]\sum_0^\infty\,\left[(n\,+\,r)(n\,+\,r\,+\,1)\,a_n\,+\,(n\,+\,r\,+1)\,a_{n\,+\,1}\,-\,a_{n\,-\,2}\right]\,x^{n\,+\,r}\,=\,0[/tex]

Now, I get the indicial equation

[tex](r^2\,-\,r)\,a_0\,+\,(r\,+\,1)\,a_1\,=\,0[/tex]

[tex]r^2\,-\,r\,=\,0\,\longrightarrow\,r^2\,-\,r\,=\,0\,\longrightarrow\,r\,=\,0,\,1[/tex]

But the roots are both supposed to be zero, what did I do wrong?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
VinnyCee said:

Homework Statement



Apply the method of Frobenius to find the roots of the indicial equation to show that [itex]c_1\,=\,c_2\,=\,0[/itex].

The equation in question is a 2nd order DE that was https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=177492".

[tex]z\,\frac{d^2T}{dx^2}\,+\,\frac{z}{x}\,\frac{dT}{dx}\,-\,z\,y\,=\,0[/tex]

If you look at the thread where this equation was derived, we assume that [itex]z\,=\,x^2[/itex].

[tex]x^2\,\frac{d^2T}{dx^2}\,+\,\frac{x^2}{x}\,\frac{dT}{dx}\,-\,x^2\,y\,=\,0[/tex]
So the equation is really
[tex]x^2\frac{d^2T}{dx^2}+ x\frac{dT}{dx}- x^y= 0[/tex]
and with y= T-Ta, that's
[tex]x^2\frac{d^2T}{dx^2}+ x\frac{dT}{dx}- x^2T- x^2Ta= 0[/tex]


Homework Equations



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frobenius_method"



The Attempt at a Solution



There is a regular, singular point at [itex]x_0\,=\,0[/itex]. We seek a solution of the form

[tex]\sum_0^\infty\,a_n\,x^{n\,+\,r}[/tex]

Differentiating that sum twice and substituting into the steady-state heat balance equation above and bringing the x's into the sums

[tex]\sum_0^\infty\,(n\,+\,r)(n\,+\,r\,+1)\,a_n\,x^{n\,+\,r}\,+\,\sum_0^\infty\,(n\,+\,r)\,a_n\,x^{n\,+\,r\,-1}\,-\,\sum_0^\infty\,a_n\,x^{n\,+\,r\,+\,2}\,+\,T_a\,x^2\,=\,0[/tex]

Note the last term, it arises from using [itex]y\,=\,T\,-\,T_a[/itex] from the https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=177492". I really don't know what to do with it, I don't think it is constant, but how do I combine into sums and how do I deal with the constant [itex]T_a[/itex]? I am going to eliminate it, but don't know why!

Now, changing the indicies to combine the summations

[tex]\sum_0^\infty\,\left[(n\,+\,r)(n\,+\,r\,+\,1)\,a_n\,+\,(n\,+\,r\,+1)\,a_{n\,+\,1}\,-\,a_{n\,-\,2}\right]\,x^{n\,+\,r}\,=\,0[/tex]

Now, I get the indicial equation

[tex](r^2\,-\,r)\,a_0\,+\,(r\,+\,1)\,a_1\,=\,0[/tex]
No, don't change the indicies yet. You should never have any "a" except a0 in the indicial equation. Going back to the equation before you changed the indicies, observe that the lowest power occurs when n= 0 (that's always true) in the middle sum. Then you get [itex]a_0 r x^r[/itex] and that is the ONLY way you get xr in the entire sum. In order that that be 0 (so the entire sum will be identically 0) is to have either a0= 0 or r= 0. The whole point of Frobenious' method is to choose r so that the first term, a0 is NOT 0. We must have r= 0.

[tex]r^2\,-\,r\,=\,0\,\longrightarrow\,r^2\,-\,r\,=\,0\,\longrightarrow\,r\,=\,0,\,1[/tex]

But the roots are both supposed to be zero, what did I do wrong?

As far as the "Tax2" term is concerned, include Ta in the equation for the coefficient of x2 but no other power.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K