Solve the iterative problem below

  • Thread starter Thread starter chwala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Iterative
chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,825
Reaction score
413
Homework Statement
see attached
Relevant Equations
numerical analysis
I need insight on ##Q.2 (ii)## part only,

1636205529013.png


find mark scheme here;
1636205589245.png


How do we determine suitable equation, ##x=x...##?

ok, just looking at the solution, we shall have;
##2x^3+50 = x^3+100##
##x^3=50##
→##x##=##\sqrt[3]50##≡##3.68403## which is the value of ##α## ( convergent value as indicated in previous step).

I think it was an error to indicate ##3\sqrt 50## ...am assuming it was a typo error which is a bit misleading...been cracking my head trying to figure out on this.:cool:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Keith_McClary
Physics news on Phys.org
chwala said:
Homework Statement:: see attached
Relevant Equations:: numerical analysis

I need insight on ##Q.2 (ii)## part only,

View attachment 291842

find mark scheme here;
View attachment 291843

How do we determine suitable equation, ##x=x...##?

ok, just looking at the solution, we shall have;
##2x^3+50 = x^3+100##
##x^3=50##
→##x##=##\sqrt[3]50##≡##3.68403## which is the value of ##α## ( convergent value as indicated in previous step).
From the recurrence relation, you can write this:
$$x = \frac{x^4 + 100x}{2x^3 + 50} \Rightarrow 2x^4 + 50 x = x^4 + 100x$$
IOW, all I did was replace ##x_n## and ##x_{n + 1}## by x.
The latter equation simplifies to ##x(x^3 - 50) = 0##, so x = 0 or ##x = \sqrt[3]{50}##
chwala said:
I think it was an error to indicate ##3\sqrt 50## ...am assuming it was a typo error which is a bit misleading...been cracking my head trying to figure out on this.:cool:
Yes, it was a typo in the problem statement. They wrote ##3\sqrt{50}## when they should have written ##\sqrt[3]{50}##; i.e., the cube root of 50, not ##3 * \sqrt{50}##.
 
Nice Mark, but you also realize that we could divide both sides of the equation by ##x##... to realize the required solution...
##x=0## in this case would not apply.
 
chwala said:
Nice Mark, but you also realize that we could divide both sides of the equation by ##x##... to realize the required solution...
##x=0## in this case would not apply.
It's almost never a good idea to divide both sides of an equation by the variable. x = 0 is a solution of the equation ##2x^4 + 50x = x^4 + 100x##, and is in fact a solution of the iterative formula ##x_{n+1} = \frac{x_n}2 \cdot \frac{x_n^3 + 100}{x_n^3 + 25}##
 
Mark44 said:
It's almost never a good idea to divide both sides of an equation by the variable. x = 0 is a solution of the equation ##2x^4 + 50x = x^4 + 100x##, and is in fact a solution of the iterative formula ##x_{n+1} = \frac{x_n}2 \cdot \frac{x_n^3 + 100}{x_n^3 + 25}##
Ok cheers Mark...agreed in that case, we may say that the mark scheme was not conclusive on the possibilities of ##x##. They ought to have given provision for two solutions, then indicate that solution ##x=0## is "unsuitable".
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top