Solve the problem involving sum of a series

  • Thread starter Thread starter chwala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series Sum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the problem of summing a series involving rational functions, specifically the expression related to the terms of the form \(\frac{1}{r(r+1)(r+2)(r+3)}\). Participants are exploring various methods to approach the problem, including numerical evaluations and formal proofs.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the decomposition of the series and the use of telescoping sums. Some suggest a formal proof approach while others reflect on numerical methods. There are questions about the validity and rigor of different approaches, including the preference for formal proofs over numerical examples.

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered insights into the problem, with some suggesting alternative methods of decomposition and summation. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of different approaches, but no consensus has been reached on a single method.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the necessity of a formal proof versus numerical solutions, indicating a potential divergence in understanding the problem's requirements. There is also mention of textbook examples that may influence participants' approaches.

chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,828
Reaction score
425
Homework Statement
Show that ##\dfrac{1}{r(r+1)(r+2)} -\dfrac{1}{(r+1)(r+2)(r+3)}= \dfrac{3}{r(r+1)(r+2)(r+3)}##; hence sum the series ## \sum_{r=1}^n \dfrac{1}{r(r+1)(r+2)(r+3)}##
Relevant Equations
Method of difference
1671706716004.png


Attempt;
##\dfrac{1}{r(r+1)(r+2)} -\dfrac{1}{(r+1)(r+2)(r+3)}=\dfrac{(r+3)-1(r)}{r(r+1)(r+2)(r+3)}=\dfrac{3}{r(r+1)(r+2)(r+3)}##

Let ##f(r)=\dfrac{1}{r(r+1)(r+2)}##

##f(r+1)= \dfrac{1}{(r+1)(r+2)(r+3)}##

Therefore ##\dfrac{3}{r(r+1)(r+2)(r+3)}## is of the form ##f(r)-f(r+1)##

When ##r=1## we have

##\left[\dfrac{1}{6}- \dfrac{1}{24}\right]##

When ##r=2## we have

##\left[\dfrac{1}{24}- \dfrac{1}{60}\right]##

When ##r=3## we have

##\left[\dfrac{1}{60}- \dfrac{1}{120}\right]##

...

When ##r=n## we shall have

##\dfrac{1}{n(n+1)(n+2)}- \dfrac{1}{(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}##

Therefore;

##3\sum_{r=1}^n \dfrac{1}{r(r+1)(r+2)(r+3)}=\left[\dfrac{1}{6}-\dfrac{1}{(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}\right]##

##\sum_{r=1}^n \dfrac{1}{r(r+1)(r+2)(r+3)}=\left[\dfrac{1}{18}-\dfrac{1}{3(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}\right]##

Your insight welcome...refreshing on this today...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good. But rather than working out the numerical values for a few early terms, a more ‘formal’ proof might be something like this:

Let ##g(r) = \frac 3{r(r+1)(r+2)(r+3)}##. You have already defined ##f(r)## and established that ##g(r) = f(r) – f(r+1)##.

##\begin {flalign*}
\sum_{r=1}^n g(r)
&= \sum_{r=1}^n (f(r)-f(r+1))\\
&= f(1)-f(2)+f(2)-f(3)+f(3)-f(4)...+f(n)-f(n+1)\\
&= f(1)-f(n+1)\\
\end {flalign*}##
etc.

Edit - typo's
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chwala
@chwala ,
In each of your similarly titled threads, you are looking for a result which can be written to depend upon the difference of two sums,
These are: ##\displaystyle \quad \sum_{r=1}^n f(r) \quad ## and ##\displaystyle \quad \sum_{r=1}^n f(r+1) \quad ## .

Notice that the first of these can be written as ##\displaystyle \quad \sum_{r=1}^n f(r) = f(1) + \sum_{r=2}^n f(r) ## .

The second can be written as:

##\displaystyle \sum_{r=1}^n f(r+1) = \sum_{r=2}^{n+1} f(r) ##
##\displaystyle \quad \quad \quad \quad = f(n+1)+ \sum_{r=2}^n f(r) \quad ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Steve4Physics and chwala
I have literally studied the examples in my textbook (solved numerically) and applied the same procedure to the given problem...are you of the opinion that the 'formal' approach is the most concrete way of proof? cheers @SammyS @Steve4Physics
 
chwala said:
I have literally studied the examples in my textbook (solved numerically) and applied the same procedure to the given problem...are you of the opinion that the 'formal' approach is the most concrete way of proof? cheers @SammyS @Steve4Physics
I’m not a mathematician but, IMO, it’s a case of rigour and aesthetics.

General proofs should be independent of specific numerical values. It’s worth developing the skill to present proofs in this way.

Incidentally, I like @SammyS's method better than mine.
 
Pal @chwala we can directly decompose ##\frac{1}{r (r+1) (r+2) (r+3)}## as
$$
\frac{1/6}{r} - \frac{1/2}{r+1} + \frac{1/2}{r+2} - \frac{1/6}{r+3}
$$
Apply sigma and segregate as follows:
$$
\begin{align*}
\left(\frac{1}{6} \sum_{r=1}^{n} \frac{1}{r} - \frac{1}{r+3}\right) + \left(\frac{1}{2} \sum_{r=1}^{n} \frac{1}{r+2} - \frac{1}{r+1}\right) \\
\end{align*}
$$

The calculations can be carried on...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
Hall said:
Pal @chwala we can directly decompose ##\frac{1}{r (r+1) (r+2) (r+3)}## as
$$
\frac{1/6}{r} - \frac{1/2}{r+1} + \frac{1/2}{r+2} - \frac{1/6}{r+3}
$$
Apply sigma and segregate as follows:
$$
\begin{align*}
\left(\frac{1}{6} \sum_{r=1}^{n} \frac{1}{r} - \frac{1}{r+3}\right) + \left(\frac{1}{2} \sum_{r=1}^{n} \frac{1}{r+2} - \frac{1}{r+1}\right) \\
\end{align*}
$$

The calculations can be carried on...
Appreciated @Hall , is the decomposition (i.e the part where you are segregating) correct? Let me go through that...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K