Solve the problem that involves diameter of the Bullseye

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the diameter of a bullseye using trigonometric principles and approximations. The problem involves a line segment AB and a point P on its perpendicular bisector, with AB subtending a specific angle. The calculations provided yield a diameter of approximately 2.91 meters, using both exact trigonometric methods and a small-angle approximation. The confusion stems from the wording of the problem, which some participants find unclear. Overall, the calculations demonstrate the effectiveness of using trigonometry and approximations in solving the problem.
chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,827
Reaction score
415
Homework Statement
See attached.
Relevant Equations
angular method
1694235573805.png


I really do not understand what they are asking here...wording here in english is a bit confusing to me...but from similar examples, i made use of the approach below (which i still do not understand) hence my post.

##\dfrac{30π}{60 ×180} = \dfrac{0.0254}{d}##

##d = \dfrac{274.32}{30π}##

##d= 2.91 ##metres
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Given a line segment AB and a point P that lies on the perpendicular bisector of AB, we say that AB subtends an angle of ##a## at P if the angle ##\angle APB=a##.
In this problem you have ##\bar{AB}=0.0254## (AB is any diameter segment of the bullseye), ##a=30\ \mathrm{minutes}\ = 30\times \frac1{60}\times \frac{\pi}{180}\ \mathrm{radians}## and you need to work out the distance ##\bar{PX}## where X is the midpoint of AB. You can do that exactly using trigonometry. Or you can use the approximation that, for small angles, which we have here, tan(a) approximately equals a. That is what your calculation does.
I get 2.91061 using the exact, trigonometric approach and 2.91063 using the small-angle approximation. So the approximation works well here.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and chwala
chwala said:
I really do not understand what they are asking here...wording here in english is a bit confusing to me...but from similar examples, i made use of the approach below (which i still do not understand) hence my post.
Please, see:

https://www.mathsisfun.com/definitions/subtended-angle.html

AB subtends an angle.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes e_jane and chwala
The working out suggests first equating ## \sqrt{i} = x + iy ## and suggests that squaring and equating real and imaginary parts of both sides results in ## \sqrt{i} = \pm (1+i)/ \sqrt{2} ## Squaring both sides results in: $$ i = (x + iy)^2 $$ $$ i = x^2 + 2ixy -y^2 $$ equating real parts gives $$ x^2 - y^2 = 0 $$ $$ (x+y)(x-y) = 0 $$ $$ x = \pm y $$ equating imaginary parts gives: $$ i = 2ixy $$ $$ 2xy = 1 $$ I'm not really sure how to proceed from here.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
890
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K