Solve the Riddle: 4*12=6, 8*8=1, 5*6?

  • Thread starter Thread starter roeller
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Riddle
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a riddle involving unconventional multiplication equations: 4*12=6 and 8*8=1, with the goal of determining the value of 5*6. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and exploration of modular arithmetic.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the riddle can be solved using multiplication modulo 7.
  • Another participant confirms the modulo 7 approach as correct.
  • A later reply provides detailed reasoning for the modulo 7 interpretation, showing calculations for 4*12 and 8*8.
  • This participant also raises concerns about the uniqueness of the modulo 7 solution, suggesting that the numbers involved could imply other modulo bases, such as modulo 3.
  • Further, the participant explores the implications of using both mod 3 and mod 7, proposing that 5*6 could equal 0 (mod 3) and 9 (mod 21), presenting 9 as a preferable answer.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on a single solution, as multiple interpretations of the riddle and different modulo bases are discussed. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best answer.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of modular arithmetic and the potential for multiple valid interpretations based on different moduli. There are unresolved assumptions regarding the choice of modulo bases and the representation of numbers in modular arithmetic.

roeller
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi there

I have a riddle here, i cannot solve. :cry:
Please help me. :shy:

If
4*12=6
and
8*8=1

what's 5*6?

Thank you in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
2

(It's multiplication mod 7.)
 
Thanks! That's it!
 
Curiosity, what is the reasoning exactly?
 
devious gave his reasoning: it's multiplication modulo 7:

4*12= 48= 7*6+ 6 so 4*12= 6 mod 7
8* 8= 64= 7*9+ 1 so 8*8= 1 mod 7

then 5*6= 30= 4*7+ 2 so 5*6= 2 mod 7.

HOWEVER, that is not the only answer. If fact, that 12 in "4*12" as well as the 8 in "8*8" makes me suspicious of the multiplication being "mod 7". It is common (but not required) to reduce numbers to be less that the modulo number. (Strictly speaking the objects in "modulo arithmetic" are equivalence classes of integers. You can use any number in an equivalence class to "represent" it and it is common to use the smallest positive number.)

Saying 4*12= 6 (mod k) means 4*12= 48= nk+ 6 for some integer n. That is the same as nk= 42.
Saying 8*8= 1 (mod k) means 8*8= 64= mk+ 1 for some integer m. That is the same as mk= 63.
42 factors as 2*3*7 and 63 factors as 3*3*7.

It is the fact that 7 is a common factor (so 42= n(7) with n=6) that leads to the conclusion that 4*12= 6 (mod 7) and (63= m(7) with m= 9) 8*8= 1 (mod 7).

Of course, 3 is also a common factor: 42= n(3) with n= 14 and 63= m(3) with m= 21. 4*12= 48= 42+ 6= (14)(3)= 6 so 4*12= 6 (mod 3) and 8*8= 64= 63+ 1= (21)(3)+ 1 so 8*8= 1 (mod 3). Of course that "= 6 (mod 3)" looks a little strange since, as I said, we normally choose a representative less than the base. Of course, 5*6= 30= 3*10 so 5*6= 0 (mod 3).

My preference would be (mod 3*7) or (mod 21).
Since 4*12= 48= 42+ 6= 2(21)+ 6, 4*12= 6 (mod 21).
Since 8*8= 64= 63+ 1= 3(21)+ 1, 8*8= 1 (mod 21).

That gives 5*6= 30= 21+ 9 so 5*6= 9 (mod 21).

I would support 9 as the best answer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K