Can You Solve This Challenging Functional Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LCSphysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functional
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on solving the functional equation $$f(xf(y) + f(x)) + f(y^2) = f(x) + yf(x + y)$$. Key findings include that the function must satisfy conditions such as $f(0) = 0$ and $f(f(x)) = f(x)$. The only solutions identified are $f(x) = x$ and $f(x) = 0$, with discussions on the existence of non-continuous solutions. The analysis also touches on Cauchy's functional equation, leading to the conclusion that $f(x) = ax$ for $a \in \{0, 1\}$ are the only continuous solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of functional equations
  • Familiarity with Cauchy's functional equation
  • Knowledge of Taylor series expansions
  • Basic properties of odd functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of Cauchy's functional equation on real functions
  • Investigate the properties of non-continuous solutions to functional equations
  • Study the role of differentiability in functional equations
  • Learn about the uniqueness of solutions in functional equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of advanced calculus, and anyone interested in functional equations and their applications in real analysis.

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
163
Homework Statement
"Find all functions f: R in R such that x and y belong to R" (R is obviously real space) (continuation in the blank frame
Relevant Equations
\n
$$f(xf(y) + f(x)) + f(y^2) = f(x) + yf(x + y)$$

A tricky question, i think.
First fact i found was:
f(f(0)) = 0
So i separate it in two types of functions
f(0) = 0 and f(0) = u.

I was trying to analyzing both cases, with the cases where x = y and x = -y but is is rather extended way, so i believe there is a better attempt to solve the question
Anyway i am not sure if we have a solution with explicit functions (f(x) = x²) or if the answer end to be something like (f(x) + f(y) + ...)

Any tips?

@fresh_42
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I see an obvious example of solution
f(x)=x.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LCSphysicist and Delta2
anuttarasammyak said:
I see an obvious example of solution
f(x)=x.
And how do you prove this is the only function possible?
 
I see another solution f(x)=0.

There may be more but I am not sure. How about writing f(x) in Taylor expansion form and taking a look at the coefficients of the same ##x^n y^m## term ,i.e
f(x)=f(0)+xf'(0)+...
Hence we know ## f(0)=0, f'(0)=0,1##, f"(0)=0,...
 
Last edited:
anuttarasammyak said:
I see another solution f(x)=0.

There may be more but I am not sure. How about writing f(x) in Taylor expansion form and taking a look at the coefficients of the same ##x^n y^m## term ,i.e
f(x)=f(0)+xf'(0)+...
Hence we know ## f(0)=0, f'(0)=0,1##, f"(0)=0,...
Who says a solution must be differentiable?
 
anuttarasammyak said:
I see another solution f(x)=0.

There may be more but I am not sure. How about writing f(x) in Taylor expansion form and taking a look at the coefficients of the same ##x^n y^m## term ,i.e
f(x)=f(0)+xf'(0)+...
Hence we know ## f(0)=0, f'(0)=0,1##, f"(0)=0,...
I imagined in open in Taylor, but i believe it would be so troublesome, we have not just x, we have f as function of y and other variables too.

I was thinking if the only possible answer happens to be just a lot of guess, i would be disappointed

. Maybe @PeroK can think in something to help us.
 
LCSphysicist said:
Maybe @PeroK can think in something to help us.
Not immediately!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
LCSphysicist said:
So i separate it in two types of functions
f(0) = 0 and f(0) = u.
Follow that path. What general equation does x=0 give you? What about y=0 instead?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anuttarasammyak
haruspex said:
Follow that path. What general equation does x=0 give you? What about y=0 instead?
Yes, i tried a lot and i found that the only functions which satisfy all the conditions is ##f(\gamma) = \gamma##
I checked and confirmed that the angular coefficiente need to be 1, and can not be any linear coefficient.
@anuttarasammyak made a nice guess #2.
 
  • #10
LCSphysicist said:
i found that the only functions which satisfy all the conditions is ##f(\gamma) = \gamma##
Are you saying you have proved that, or just that it is the only solution you have found?
 
  • #11
Say x=0
f(f(0))+f(y^2)=f(0)+yf(y).
Say y=0
f(xf(0)+f(x))=f(x),further say x=0
f(f(0))=f(0)
So
f(y^2)=yf(y)
f(0)=0. For ##y \neq 0##
\frac{f(y^2)}{y^2}=\frac{f(y)}{y}=c
We can easily know allowed values of c by inputting f(y)=cy, which satisfy f(0)=0, to the original equation or the above second equation.

EDIT
I add on the features
f(f(x))=f(x)
which shows nature of projection.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
anuttarasammyak said:
Say x=0
f(f(0))+f(y^2)=f(0)+yf(y).
Say y=0
f(xf(0)+f(x))=f(x),further say x=0
f(f(0))=f(0)
So
f(y^2)=yf(y)
f(0)=0. For ##y \neq 0##
\frac{f(y^2)}{y^2}=\frac{f(y)}{y}=c
We can easily know allowed values of c by inputting f(y)=cy, which satisfy f(0)=0, to the original equation or the above second equation.

From
\frac{f(y^2)}{y^2}=\frac{f(y)}{y}

we can't conclude that both sides are constant, can we? We can define a new function
g(x) = f(x)/x

Then we have:
g(x) = g(x^2)

Does that imply that g is a constant function?
 
  • #13
Hi.
\frac{f(x^2)}{x^2}=\frac{f(x)}{x},\ f(0)=0
So f(x) is odd function of x. Let us expand it in series
f(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{+\infty}a_{2n+1}\ x^{2n+1}
The above relation shows
\sum_{n=0}^{+\infty}a_{2n+1}\ (x^{4n}-x^{2n})=0
All the coefficients except ##a_1## are zero.
 
  • #14
anuttarasammyak said:
Hi.
\frac{f(x^2)}{x^2}=\frac{f(x)}{x},\ f(0)=0
So f(x) is odd function of x. Let us expand it in series
f(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{+\infty}a_{2n+1}\ x^{2n+1}
The above relation shows
\sum_{n=0}^{+\infty}a_{2n+1}\ (x^{4n}-x^{2n})=0
All the coefficients except ##a_1## are zero.
As has been pointed out, this approach is utterly invalid. We are not given that f is continuous, let alone differentiable.
 
  • #15
haruspex said:
We are not given that f is continuous, let alone differentiable.
Thanks. I admit my proof #13 works only if f(x) can be expressed in series.

For example
f(1)=1, f(-1)=-1, f(x)=0 otherwise
is a solution.
 
Last edited:
  • #16
anuttarasammyak said:
f(1)=1, f(-1)=-1, f(x)=0 otherwise
is a solution.
Are you sure? What about x=1, y=-2?
 
  • #17
Thanks. #15 is a solution of equation f(x)/x=f(x^2)/x^2, f(x)=0. I see it does not satisfy the equation of post #1 , as you pointed out. As I should find the allowed values of c in post #11, not all the solutions of the equation f(x)/x=f(x^2)/x^2, f(x)=0 are the solution of the equation of post #1.

Now I am much interested to know whether we have more solutions other than analytic f(x)=cx, c={0,1}.
 
Last edited:
  • #18
anuttarasammyak said:
Thanks. #15 is a solution of equation f(x)/x=f(x^2)/x^2, f(x)=0. I see it does not satisfy the equation of post #1 , as you pointed out. As I should find the allowed values of c in post #11, not all the solutions of the equation f(x)/x=f(x^2)/x^2, f(x)=0 are the solution of the equation of post #1.

Now I am much interested to know whether we have more solutions other than analytic f(x)=cx, c={0,1}.
So far I have only managed to show
f(0) = 0
f(f(x)) = f(x)
f(x2) = x f(x)
If f(u) = u then f(nu) = nu for all integers n.

Edit:
Oh, and I forgot
f(-x)=-f(x)
 
Last edited:
  • #19
haruspex said:
So far I have only managed to show
f(0) = 0
f(f(x)) = f(x)
f(x2) = x f(x)
If f(u) = u then f(nu) = nu for all integers n.
That is also tremendous progress. This allow you to simplify the functional equation to $$xf(y) + yf(y) = yf(x+y)$$
 
  • #20
Re:#19
Your result toghether with the equation suggest the relation
f(xf(y)+f(x))=xf(y)+f(x)
I am not sure it stands.
 
  • #21
William Crawford said:
That is also tremendous progress. This allow you to simplify the functional equation to $$xf(y) + yf(y) = yf(x+y)$$
If so, doesn't it immediately follow that yf(x )=xf(y)?
 
  • #22
anuttarasammyak said:
Re:#19
Your result toghether with the equation suggest the relation
f(xf(y)+f(x))=xf(y)+f(x)
I am not sure it stands.
No, you are right. What I wrote in 19 wasn't correct.
 
  • #23
From ##f(x^2)=xf(x)## conclude that ##f## is an odd function i.e. ##f(-x)=-f(x)##. If we take ##(x,y) = (-x,y)## then we get that
$$ f(-xf(y)+f(-x)) + yf(y) = f(-x) + yf(y-x) $$
or, by using the odd property of ##f##, that
$$ -f(xf(y)+f(x)) + yf(y) = -f(x) + yf(y-x). $$
Now, add this equation with the original functional equation, to get that
$$ 2f(x) = f(x+y) + f(x-y).$$
Next, use that ##f(x+y)## is symmetric under ##(x,y)\mapsto(y,x)## to derive that
$$ f(x)-f(y) = f(x-y)$$
or equivalently that
$$ f(x)+f(y) = f(x+y).$$
This is nothing more than Cauchy's functional equation. Thus, if it is assumed that ##f:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}## is continuous, then ##f(x) = ax## for ##a\in\mathbb{R}## are all the solutions.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anuttarasammyak
  • #24
Excellent! but
f(f(x))=f(x)
puts us
a^2=a?
 
  • #25
anuttarasammyak said:
Excellent! but
f(f(x))=f(x)
puts us
a^2=a?
True, however that just imply that either ##a=1## or ##a=0##.
 
  • #26
Thanks. That meet with my #17. Can you tell me if other non analytic solutions exist?
 
  • #27
I believe that ##f(x) = ax## for ##a\in\{0,1\}## are the entire family of continuous solutions (consisting of elementary functions) to the original functional equation. As any continuous solution also has to be a solution to the Cauchy's functional equation. However there exist non-continuous solutions to the Cauchy's functional equation and there might therefore also exist non-continuous solutions to the original functional equation.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anuttarasammyak
  • #28
haruspex said:
If f(u) = u then f(nu) = nu for all integers n.
f(x)+f(y)=f(x+y) tells us f(nx)=f(x)+f((n-1)x)=... = n f(x)

Is "If f(u) = u" is necessary to say f(nu) = nf(u) and why n is limited to integer not any real number ?
 
Last edited:
  • #29
anuttarasammyak said:
Thanks. That meet with my #17. Can you tell me if other non analytic solutions exist?
The function ##f(x) = \mathrm{max}(x,0)## (i.e. the positive part) is also a solution to Cauchy as well and though it is continuous it isn't differentiable at ##x=0## and thus not analytic. Check for yourself if also satisfy the original functional equation.
 
  • #30
Hi. Say f(x)=max(x,0)
f(x)+f(-x)=|x|and

f(x)+f(-x)=0
seem incompatible.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K