Solve Value of R: Moment & Equilibrium

  • Context: Engineering 
  • Thread starter Thread starter maitake91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium Moment
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
maitake91
Messages
9
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Solve the value of R based on the diagram attached.
Relevant Equations
Sum of moment in equilibrium = 0
Summary:: I need some help with moment when using equations of equilibrium

Edit: Sorry I forgot to say what the question was! The question was to solve the value of R based on the diagram below alone.

I was solving the question below and I tried to resolve R into a force that is perpendicular to the beam, but I couldn't. So then I looked at the workout for the answer, and apparently you don't have to do that, since they just used R to multiply 8. I don't understand why this is the case. By intuition, I imagine if I tried to push a beam with the same force but did it diagonally instead of at a position perpendicularly towards the beam, it makes more sense to me that it would spin slower. Please can someone explain to me why I am wrong? I would really appreciate the help.

スクリーンショット 2020-08-14 20.44.05.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome, maitake91 :cool:

Your intuition is correct: If you "tried to push a beam with the same force but did it diagonally instead of at a position perpendicularly towards the beam", the value of the resulting moment or torque would be smaller.
For the extreme case of line of application of the force intercepting the fulcrum, the torque value would be zero.

The value of R, if perpendicularly applied to the beam, would be 8.00/8.67 times smaller than the represented R.
All torques are in reference to the fulcrum A.
The reactive force that compensates for the angular application of the 500 N applied on B is Ax.
The direction of the reactive force on B can only be perpendicular to the surface that supports the rocking fixture (note its rounded base).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: maitake91
Lnewqban said:
Welcome, maitake91 :cool:

Your intuition is correct: If you "tried to push a beam with the same force but did it diagonally instead of at a position perpendicularly towards the beam", the value of the resulting moment or torque would be smaller.
For the extreme case of line of application of the force intercepting the fulcrum, the torque value would be zero.

The value of R, if perpendicularly applied to the beam, would be 8.00/8.67 times smaller than the represented R.
All torques are in reference to the fulcrum A.
The reactive force that compensates for the angular application of the 500 N applied on B is Ax.
The direction of the reactive force on B can only be perpendicular to the surface that supports the rocking fixture (note its rounded base).
Thank you so much for your reply, it was very helpful and I understand now!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban