*solved*Particle moving along a parabola

  • Thread starter Thread starter rxh140630
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parabola
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a particle moving along a parabolic path defined by the equation y = x^2. Participants are exploring various aspects of the problem, including potential solutions and the implications of physical forces such as gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the trivial and non-trivial solutions to the problem, questioning whether additional solutions exist beyond those provided in the textbook. There is also exploration of the role of gravity and whether it is necessary for the problem. Some participants suggest parameterizing the curve and consider the implications of changing coordinates with respect to time.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants raising questions about the assumptions made in the problem statement and the clarity of the textbook. Some guidance is offered regarding parameterization and implicit differentiation, but there is no explicit consensus on the best approach or the completeness of the solutions discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of detail in the problem statement and express frustration over assumptions made by the author. There is mention of terminology that may indicate the textbook is outdated, which could affect understanding.

rxh140630
Messages
60
Reaction score
11
Homework Statement
A particle is constrained to move along a parabola whose equation is y=x^2. At what point on the curve are the abscissa and the ordinate changing at the same rate?
Relevant Equations
x^2=y, dx/dy= 2x
Would the trivial solution be x=0,y=0?

Non trivial:

let y=x^2

\frac{dy}{dx}=2x, \frac{dx}{dy} = \frac12y^{-\frac12}

x=\frac14 y^{-\frac12}

here x=1 and y = 1/16 is a solution

but my book says the answer is x=1/2 and y=1/4

this is one answer that you get with the equation I derived, but I feel like it's not the only answer. Am I missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't you need something like a force of gravity here?
 
PeroK said:
Don't you need something like a force of gravity here?

No clue, it's a calculus book, I'm guessing they decided to remove gravity from the equation.
 
  • Sad
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
rxh140630 said:
No clue, it's a calculus book, I'm guessing they decided to remove gravity from the equation.
Perhaps it doesn't matter whether the particle is accelerating or not?

What about parameterising the curve? I assume "changing at the same rate" means with respect to time.
 
PeroK said:
Perhaps it doesn't matter whether the particle is accelerating or not?

What about parameterising the curve? I assume "changing at the same rate" means with respect to time.

Yeap, no mention of accelerating, I don't really know what that is. That's just the derivative of velocity right? It doesn't mention velocity or acceleration. Just how the two coordinates change with respect to each other, which I guess implies velocity? I need to start reading a physics textbook.

Yes, I believe changing at the same rate means with respect to time. I wrote out the whole question word for word as per the book. I wish the author was a tad more detailed and made less assumptions in his questions.
 
rxh140630 said:
Yeap, no mention of accelerating, I don't really know what that is. That's just the derivative of velocity right? It doesn't mention velocity or acceleration. Just how the two coordinates change with respect to each other, which I guess implies velocity? I need to start reading a physics textbook.

Yes, I believe changing at the same rate means with respect to time. I wrote out the whole question word for word as per the book. I wish the author was a tad more detailed and made less assumptions in his questions.
I had to look up "abscissa" and "ordinate" (and found they mean ##x## and ##y##), so perhaps this is a book from a bygone era. And I promptly forgot which one is which!

That said, you should parameterise the curve in terms of ##t##.
 
Last edited:
PeroK said:
I had to look up "abscissa" and "ordinate" (and found they mean ##x## and ##y##), so perhaps this is a book from a bygone era. And I prompty forgot which one is which!

That said, you should parameterise the curve in terms of ##t##.
Hmm actually I think implicit differentiation is the easiest way to do this problem.

it gives you the result x=1/2 and y=1/4, the books answer
 
rxh140630 said:
... Yes, I believe changing at the same rate means with respect to time. I wrote out the whole question word for word as per the book. I wish the author was a tad more detailed and made less assumptions in his questions.
Could it simply be the point of the curve around which Δx≈Δy?
If so, that would the point at which the slope of a straight line tangent to the curve equals 1, I believe.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS and vela

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K