Solving 6/(2[1+2]), 3(3)=1 Confusion

  • Thread starter Thread starter leapoldstotch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the mathematical expression 6/2(1+2) and the ambiguity in its evaluation. The consensus is that the correct answer is 9, but there is debate about the interpretation of the order of operations. Some argue that the expression can be evaluated as 6/(2[1+2])=1 or 3(3)=1, leading to confusion. The main point of contention is whether one should prioritize evaluating the parenthesis before performing division from left to right. While some calculators yield 1 for the expression, participants seek authoritative sources that clarify the need to evaluate expressions affecting parentheses first. The conversation highlights the ongoing confusion surrounding order of operations in mathematics.
leapoldstotch
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Of course the answer is 9. But my question is, some sources say this is written ambiguously.
as in, 6/(2[1+2])=1
or 3(3)=1
Why do some people say one needs to evaluate what is effecting the parenthesis before dividing from left to right? I don't see anything in order of operations that would assume the first option. But when you type 6/2(1+2) into some calculators, it gives you 1. Can anybody find a source that says one needs to evaluate what is effecting the parenthesis before dividing from left to right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


This has been covered over and over and over. This is not physics. Reported.
 
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...
Back
Top