Solving A Basic Physics Problem: Momentum Conservation and Ball-Wall Collision

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a physics problem involving momentum conservation during a collision between a heavy wall moving at 60 mph and a ball moving at 120 mph. Participants conclude that the wall's mass is so large that it does not change velocity upon impact, while the ball's behavior depends on the type of collision. The consensus is that if the collision is perfectly elastic, the ball will reverse direction with the same speed relative to the wall, but will appear to be stationary relative to the ground after the collision. The problem highlights the importance of understanding collision types and reference frames in momentum conservation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of momentum conservation principles
  • Knowledge of elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Familiarity with reference frames in physics
  • Basic algebra for solving physics equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of elastic and inelastic collisions in detail
  • Learn how to analyze problems using different reference frames
  • Explore momentum conservation equations in various collision scenarios
  • Practice solving physics problems involving collisions and energy conservation
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching momentum concepts, and anyone interested in understanding collision dynamics and reference frame analysis.

tennishaha
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A very heavy wall moving at 60mph, a ball moving same direction at 120 mph.
What is direction and speed of ball after ball hit wall.


Homework Equations


I am thinking to use the momentum conservation: mass of ball*velocity of ball+mass of wall*velocity of wall don't change


The Attempt at a Solution


because the mass of wall is large, so the velocity of wall doesn't change after the hit, so does the velocity of ball (based on the conservation of momentum), so the ball still moves at 60mph? I feel i am wrong but i don't know how to prove myself wrong, thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would use an energy approach. Is it an elastic collision? because then energy would be conserved.
 
tennishaha said:

Homework Statement



A very heavy wall moving at 60mph, a ball moving same direction at 120 mph.
What is direction and speed of ball after ball hit wall.

Suppose you were sitting on the wall, moving with it, watching the collision. How fast would the ball be coming towards you? After it bounced, how fast and in what direction would it be moving with respect to you? How about in the original "ground" frame of reference?
 
gneill said:
Suppose you were sitting on the wall, moving with it, watching the collision. How fast would the ball be coming towards you? After it bounced, how fast and in what direction would it be moving with respect to you? How about in the original "ground" frame of reference?

that is not the only problem. or the primary problem.

tennishaha doesn't have enough information.
 
dacruick said:
that is not the only problem. or the primary problem.

tennishaha doesn't have enough information.

How so? What's missing?
 
I think it should be a reflection kind of problem. Before hitting, the velocity is u, and after hitting the velocity should be -u(same magnitude, but opposite direction), but I am not sure the u here is relative to ground or relative to the wall. Any ideas?
 
tennishaha said:
I think it should be a reflection kind of problem. Before hitting, the velocity is u, and after hitting the velocity should be -u(same magnitude, but opposite direction), but I am not sure the u here is relative to ground or relative to the wall. Any ideas?

Suppose you were sitting on the wall, moving with it... How would the situation look to you, sitting on the wall. Forget the ground for now. Just you, the wall, and the ball.
 
gneill said:
How so? What's missing?

The type of collision is missing. The fact that the wall is very heavy just means that we don't have information. It means that depending on the collision, the wall could just absorb all of the momentum and not change its velocity, or it means that the wall could "reflect" the energy as tennishaha said.
 
I think the ball should be still relative to the ground after hitting the wall (velocity=0). Am I correct?
 
  • #10
dacruick said:
The type of collision is missing. The fact that the wall is very heavy just means that we don't have information. It means that depending on the collision, the wall could just absorb all of the momentum and not change its velocity, or it means that the wall could "reflect" the energy as tennishaha said.

Granted, the phrasing is imprecise, but I think that "the usual" conditions should be inferred. Very heavy ==> essentially infinite mass compared to other components, and a ball usually bounces perfectly unless otherwise specified.
 
  • #11
tennishaha said:
I think the ball should be still relative to the ground after hitting the wall (velocity=0). Am I correct?

Sounds good. Now all you have to do is write out the argument and the smattering of math to accompany it.
 
  • #12
tennishaha seems to want to use momentum to solve this question. But the "usual conditions" that you've implied make this question only solvable with energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K