MHB Solving a Boundary Value Problem: Non-Uniform vs. Uniform Partitioning

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a boundary value problem using finite difference methods, specifically comparing non-uniform and uniform partitioning. The problem is defined by a second-order differential equation with boundary conditions at x=0 and x=1. An exact solution is derived through substitution, leading to a first-order linear differential equation. The exact solution is expressed as a function of x, incorporating constants determined by the boundary conditions. This exact solution can be utilized to evaluate the accuracy of numerical methods based on different partitioning strategies.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)Consider the boundary value problem
$\left\{\begin{matrix}
- \epsilon u''+u'=1 &, x \in [0,1] \\
u(0)=u(1)=0 &
\end{matrix}\right.$
where $\epsilon$ is a positive given constant.
I have to express a finite difference method for its numerical solution.
How can we know whether it is better to use non-uniform partition or uniform partition?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, you can always do the experiment and see. This BVP has an exact answer that's not too difficult to obtain. If you do the substitution $v=u'$, you get a first-order linear DE, $v'-v/\varepsilon=-1/\varepsilon$, with solution
$$v=1+C_1 e^{x/\varepsilon}.$$
Integrating once yields
$$u=x+\varepsilon C_1 e^{x/\varepsilon}+C_2.$$
Applying the boundary conditions yields the system
\begin{align*}
\varepsilon C_1+C_2&=0 \\
\varepsilon C_1 e^{1/\varepsilon}+C_2&=-1,
\end{align*}
with solution
\begin{align*}
C_1&=\frac{1}{\varepsilon(1-e^{1/\varepsilon})} \\
C_2&=\frac{1}{e^{1/\varepsilon}-1}.
\end{align*}
Hence, the exact solution is
$$u(x)=x+\frac{e^{x/\varepsilon}-1}{1-e^{1/\varepsilon}}.$$
You can use this to compare how good the two numerical solutions are.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Back
Top