Solving a Puzzling Momentum Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Canuck156
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving an elastic collision between two bodies, where a 2kg mass collides with a stationary mass and continues at 1/4 of its initial velocity. Participants emphasize the need to apply conservation of momentum and kinetic energy to find the mass of the stationary object. The challenge lies in managing the equations, as the problem presents three unknowns: the mass and final speed of the second object, and the initial speed of the first object. Despite recognizing that the final velocity of the moving object simplifies the situation, some users struggle to eliminate the unknowns mathematically. One participant believes they calculated the mass of the second object to be 1.2 kg using algebraic manipulation of the equations.
Canuck156
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I was looking through the revision section of my textbook in preperation for my test tomorrow, when I came across an interesting problem, which I can't manage to solve. :mad:

The problem is:

A body of mass 2kg collides elastically with another body that is stationary. The moving mass continues on in it's initial direction, at 1/4 of its initial velocity. What is the mass of the stationary object?

I realize that the conservation of momentum, and the conservation of kinetic energy must be used to solve this problem. I can solve it for any specific case (ie. substitute in a value for the velocity of the first object) but not generally, although it should be the same answer. I always end up with 2 equations and 3 unknowns that I cannot cancel out.

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see what the three unknowns would be. You have only the mass of the second object and its final speed and you find both of those with momentum and energy conservation.

P.S. It's strictly a one dimensional problem since the original mass continues in its original direction so neither object has a transverse component of velocity by momentum conservation,.
 
Last edited:
Well, theoretically there are 3 unknowns - the initial speed of object 1, the final speed of object 2, and the mass of object 2. However, since we are given a ratio of the initial and final velocities of object 1, I think I should be able to cancel these out somehow. I just can't figure out how.

Yes, I recognized that it was a one-dimensional problem, but was still unable to solve it. It's only the mathematics that mean I can't do it.
 
well the final velocity of the moving object would be (1/4) v(init) leaving only two unknowns, right? I'm only working through the problem in my head, but i think you should be able to represent the two unknowns in terms of the first objects initial velocity.
 
Yes, telco, I thought that too, when I was working through it in my head. But when I tried to do it on paper, I couldn't simplify the other unknowns in terms of the initial velocity. I still can't figure out how to do it.
 
Not sure if this is right, but i calculated the mass to be 1.2 kg

I used the equation v1f = ((m1+m2)/ (m1+m2))v1i
v1f= final velocity v1i= initial velocity

v1f= 1/4 v1i

Then i just did some algebra to solve for m2
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top