Solving a Second-Order Differential Equation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the period of a physical pendulum, leading to a second-order differential equation of the form \(\frac{d^2 \theta}{dt^2} = C \sin{\theta}\), where \(C\) is a constant. Participants explore the challenges of solving this equation, particularly in the context of small versus large angle approximations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the non-linear nature of the equation and the common practice of using small-angle approximations. Some suggest techniques like quadrature and mention the difficulty of integrating certain forms. Questions arise about the feasibility of theoretical formulations for large-angle pendulum motion and the implications of periodic solutions.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various approaches being explored, including numerical methods and perturbation theory for approximations. Some participants express uncertainty about the implications of their findings, particularly regarding the existence of solutions for large angles.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of experience among some participants regarding differential equations, which influences the nature of the questions and suggestions being made. Additionally, the discussion includes references to external resources for further exploration.

Saketh
Messages
258
Reaction score
2
I've been trying to derive the period of a physical pendulum, and I ended up with a differential equation that boils down to this:

[tex] \frac{d^2 \theta}{dt^2} = C \sin{\theta}[/tex]

where C is some constant.

With no experience in differential equations, I have no idea how to solve this. I can't find anything about how to solve this type of differential equation, so if someone could point me in the right direction, that would be helpful.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It can't be solved nicely, which is why we usually assume the angle is small and make the approximation [itex]\sin \theta \approx \theta[/itex]. If you want, there's a way to reduce it to finding the integral of something like [itex]1/\sqrt{a-\cos(\theta)}[/tex], but that's not a nice integral to do (ie, you need special functions).[/itex]
 
That is an extremely non-linear equation and cannot be solved in any simple form. As StatusX said, for smal values of the angle, you can make the approximation [itex]sin(\theta)= \theta[/itex] so the equation becomes [itex]d^2\theta/dt^2= C\theta[/itex].

Another technique is called "quadrature". Since t does not appear explictly in the equation, let [itex]\omega= d\theta/dt[/itex]. Then apply the chain rule: [itex]d^2\theta/dt^2= d\omega/dt= d\omega/d\theta d\theta/dt= \omega d\omega/dt= Csin \theta[/itex]. That's a separable first order differential equation which can be written as [itex]\omega d\omega= Csin(\theta)d\theta[/itex] and can be integrated directly:
[itex](1/2) \omega^2= -Ccos(\theta)+ D[/itex]. The rub is when you replace [itex]\omega[/itex] by [itex]d/t\eta/dt[/itex] and solve for [itex]d\theta/dt[/itex]: [itex]d\theta/dt= \sqrt{D -2C cos\theta}[/itex] so
[itex]\frac{d\theta}{\sqrt{D- 2C cos(\theta}}= dt[/itex] and the left side cannot be integrated in terms of any elementary function. (That's called an "elliptic" integral. I've seen whole book cases of tables of values.)
 
Does this mean that it is impossible to generate a theoretical formulation for pendulums that includes large-angle values?

I suspected that I would have to make a small-angle assumption. If I did have [itex]d^2\theta/dt^2= C\theta[/itex], how would I solve that? (Sorry for my lack of experience - once again, I just need to be pointed in the right diretcion.)
 
For small angles, yes. Of course, in order to get periodic solutions, C must be negative.
 
what function equals itself times a constant when differentiating twice?
(HINT: what's the derivative of e^x ?)
 
Saketh said:
Does this mean that it is impossible to generate a theoretical formulation for pendulums that includes large-angle values?

I suspected that I would have to make a small-angle assumption. If I did have [itex]d^2\theta/dt^2= C\theta[/itex], how would I solve that? (Sorry for my lack of experience - once again, I just need to be pointed in the right diretcion.)
You can get an approximate solution to this, to whichever degree of accuracy you desire, by perturbation theory.

Alternatively, you may use numerics
 
daniel_i_l said:
what function equals itself times a constant when differentiating twice?
(HINT: what's the derivative of e^x ?)
I don't understand - how does that help me solve the differential equation?

Thanks, everyone! http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Pendulum.html" answers all of my questions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
daniel_i_l said:
what function equals itself times a constant when differentiating twice?
(HINT: what's the derivative of e^x ?)
I can think of 4 such (independent) functions. That's why I said " Of course, in order to get periodic solutions, C must be negative."
 
  • #11
just a curious question, has there ever been a series solution to the exact motion of undamped pendulum?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K