Solving a system of equations with 5 unknowns

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hmparticle9
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving Schrödinger's equation with a potential featuring two delta spikes, specifically at positions ##a## and ##-a## with a magnitude of ##-\alpha##. The user is attempting to derive the transmission coefficient, represented as $$\frac{|F|^2}{|A|^2}$$, by establishing relationships between the variables ##A, B, C, D,## and ##F##. The user successfully derives expressions for ##C## and ##D## in terms of ##A## and ##B##, and sets up a linear system represented by a 4x4 matrix to solve for the unknowns. The final result for the ratio $$\frac{F}{A}$$ is provided, indicating a complex relationship influenced by the parameters involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically Schrödinger's equation.
  • Familiarity with delta functions and their applications in quantum potentials.
  • Knowledge of linear algebra, particularly matrix inversion and solving systems of equations.
  • Proficiency in complex numbers and their manipulation in mathematical equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the transmission coefficient in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about delta potentials and their role in scattering problems.
  • Explore matrix algebra techniques for solving linear systems, including the use of tools like Symbolab.
  • Investigate the implications of varying the parameters ##\alpha## and ##a## in the context of scattering theory.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics, mathematicians working with linear algebra, and students studying scattering theory will benefit from this discussion.

hmparticle9
Messages
157
Reaction score
26
I am solving Schrödingers equation with a potential with two "delta" spikes: One at ##a## and another at ##-a##, with magnitude ##-\alpha##. In the process of looking for scattering solutions I have come across the following four equations:

$$A + B \beta = C + D \beta$$
$$C \beta + D = F \beta$$
$$ik(C - D\beta - A + B\beta) = \delta (A+B\beta)$$
$$ik(F\beta - C\beta + D) = \delta F \beta$$

where ##\beta = e^{2ika}## and ##\delta = -\frac{2m\alpha}{h^2}##.


##A,B,C,D,F## are (possibly) complex numbers. ##k## is a constant. ##i## is the square root of ##-1##.

I need to find the transmission coefficient of the problem, which basically means I need the quantity:

$$\frac{|F|^2}{|A|^2}$$

which means I need to find ##A## in terms of ##F##, or more so the other way around. ##F## in terms of ##A##.

I have ##F## in terms of ##C## and ##D##:

$$C \beta + D = F \beta$$

I have found $$C = (\frac{\delta}{2ik} +1) A + \frac{\delta \beta}{2ik}B$$
and $$D = -\frac{\delta}{2ik\beta} A + (1-\frac{\delta}{2ik}) B$$

I have put these values in the equation

$$A + B \beta = C + D \beta$$

to verify correctness. All I need to do now is find a relationship between ##A## and ##B##.

This I am struggling with. Could someone give me a hand?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would set up the linear equation system for ##A,B,C,D## and hopefully get a ##4\times 4## matrix. Then invert this matrix, either manually or with the help of https://www.symbolab.com/solver/matrix-calculator, which allows variable names. If you have the solutions for ##A,B,C,D##, then you're done.
 
My bad. I made a mistake in the title. I have 5 unknowns.
 
hmparticle9 said:
My bad. I made a mistake in the title. I have 5 unknowns.
Where is the fifth? ##F## is a linear combination of ##C## and ##D##.
 
How do I delete questions? I solved it by hand in the end. Quite simple but tedious work
 
hmparticle9 said:
How do I delete questions? I solved it by hand in the end. Quite simple but tedious work
You have an equation for ##F## so ##A,B,C,D## would have been enough. I think the website I linked to can also solve ##5\times 5 ## matrices.
 
hmparticle9 said:
How do I delete questions? I solved it by hand in the end. Quite simple but tedious work
Why not answer your own question and show us the solution? It will help others who will read your thread.
 
  • Agree
Likes   Reactions: Mark44
I have provided an outline. Two reasons. The algebra is intense, and my workings are now in the local skip.

Quick sheets - page 2.webp
 
I used for convenience the parameters ##ik=n\, , \,b=\beta\, , \,d=\delta## and set up the equation system
\begin{align*}
\begin{pmatrix}1&1&-1&-1\\-n-d&bn-db&n&-bn\\0&0&-db&2n-d\\0&0&0&1
\end{pmatrix}&\cdot
\begin{pmatrix}A\\B\\C\\D\end{pmatrix} =
\begin{pmatrix}0\\0 \\0\\ D\end{pmatrix}\\
\end{align*}
where I hopefully didn't make typos. Then I fed
https://www.symbolab.com/solver/matrix-calculator/\left(d-db+nb+n\right)\begin{pmatrix}1&1&-1&-1\\ -n-d&bn-db&n&-bn\\ 0&0&-db&2n-d\\ 0&0&0&1\end{pmatrix}^{\left(-1\right)}?or=input
to do me the inversion. This resulted in
\begin{align*}
\dfrac{1}{d-db+nb+n}
\begin{pmatrix}-db+nb&-1&\frac{db-nb-n}{db}&-\frac{d^2b^2-d^2b+nd+3ndb-2n^2-2n^2b}{db}\\ d+n&1&-\frac{1}{b}&-\frac{-nb^2-nb-db+d-2n}{b}\\ 0&0&-\frac{d-db+nb+n}{db}&\frac{\left(-d+2n\right)\left(d-db+nb+n\right)}{db}\\ 0&0&0&d-db+nb+n\end{pmatrix}
\end{align*}
so my result is
\begin{align*}
(d-db+nb+n)\begin{pmatrix}A\\B\\C\\D\end{pmatrix}=
\begin{pmatrix}-db+nb&-1&\frac{db-nb-n}{db}&-\frac{d^2b^2-d^2b+nd+3ndb-2n^2-2n^2b}{db}\\ d+n&1&-\frac{1}{b}&-\frac{-nb^2-nb-db+d-2n}{b}\\ 0&0&-\frac{d-db+nb+n}{db}&\frac{\left(-d+2n\right)\left(d-db+nb+n\right)}{db}\\ 0&0&0&d-db+nb+n\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}0\\0\\0\\D\end{pmatrix}
\end{align*}
I used ##D## as a parameter for the solution space because the algorithm handled it best. Since the first line says ##A\sim B## with an appropriate factor, we have also all solutions depending only on ##A.##
 
Last edited:
  • #10
hmparticle9 said:
My bad. I made a mistake in the title. I have 5 unknowns.
But one of the unknowns is normalization (for scattering this is usually normalized to incident flux.... hence the ratio requested) so your original statement is OK. I recommend looking at the limits of ......α= 0, and perhaps a=0 (single delta fn at origin)
Will return to this later.... don't have the time right now. Shouldn't be too hard methinks.
 
  • #11
I have found
$$
\dfrac{F}{A}=\dfrac{2ik\delta(1-\beta)-2k^2(1+\beta)}
{\delta^2\beta(\beta-1)+ik\delta(1+3\beta)+2k^2(1+\beta)}
$$

If I were to find a mistake, I would look closer at the third equation. My suspicion is that the factor ##\beta## should be at ##C## and not at ##D.##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
534
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K