Solving a Tough Math Problem: Any Ideas?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter al-mahed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ideas
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a challenging mathematical problem involving the equation 2^n + 3 = m^m, where participants explore potential solutions, properties of m, and related equations. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and exploration of various cases and conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that m must be of the form 4x + 3 for n > 1, and that m cannot be even, suggesting it must be odd.
  • One participant claims that if m is of the form 4x + 3, the only solution is the trivial solution (0, 2).
  • Another participant argues that all odd squares are congruent to 1 mod 4, leading to a conclusion about the impossibility of certain forms of m.
  • There is a discussion about the case of 2^n + 5 = m^2, with some participants asserting that n = 2 is the only solution, while others claim there are infinitely many solutions.
  • Some participants express confusion regarding the original problem and the nature of m^m, questioning whether it can be a perfect square.
  • There are attempts to apply modular arithmetic to the problem, with participants proposing various congruences and relationships involving m and n.
  • One participant corrects a previous claim about modular relationships, indicating a misunderstanding in their earlier reasoning.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the properties of m and the potential solutions to the equation. There is no consensus on the existence of solutions beyond the trivial case, and the discussion remains unresolved with various hypotheses presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight limitations in their reasoning, such as assumptions about the nature of m and the conditions under which certain equations hold. There are unresolved mathematical steps and dependencies on definitions that affect the conclusions drawn.

al-mahed
Messages
262
Reaction score
0
I came across this problem on another forum. Seems to be very tough.

The only trivial facts are:

m is of the form 4x+3 for n>1

a trivial solution (n,m) is (0,2)

for n even, m^m-1 is divisible by 3
for n odd, m^m-2 is divisible by 3


any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To input something in this discussion, aside from the trivial solution, m can't be even. If m was even, the parities don't match up, so you know that m has to be odd. I'll try to figure something more later.
 
If you are right that "m is of the form 4x+3 for n>1", then the only solution is the trivial solution.
 
M can not be even, since 2^n+3 is always odd. but all odd squares are congruent to 1 Mod 4, so that2^n congruent to 0 for n greater than one. So he only possibility is m^2 = 5, which is not a square.

Now if we try the case of 2^n+5 =m^2, we have a solution for n=2, m=3. Are there more? No, why?

M can not be even, so it is odd. All such square are congruent to 1 Mod 8. So we have
2^n+5=1+8K, or 2^n+4 = 8K, which reduces to 2^(n-2) + 1 =2K. This is possible only for the previously described case n-2 = 0.
 
robert

I didn`t understand what you did, m is not necessarely of the form 8t+1, m^m is not a square as the exponent m is odd, 3^3 - 1 is not divisible by 8 (and not by 4 neither), 5^5-1 is not divisible by 8, and infinitely many other examples.

jgm340

when n > 1, m is of the form 4x+3

2^1+3=5=4+1
2^2+3=7=4+3
2^3+3=11=4*2+3
2^4+3=19=4*4+3

and so on
 
All odd squares are of the form 8K+1. (2n+1)^2 =4n^2+4n+1 =4n(n+1)+1. I am also looking at the case not for 3, but for 5: 2^n+5 = m^2.
 
I know this fact about perfect odd squares, the thing is: m^m is NOT a perfect odd square, m is odd, so we have (2k+1)^{(2k+1)}=(2k+1)^{2k}(2k+1), a square times a non square (only if m is a square itself)

and moreover, 2^n+3=2^n+2+1=2(2^{n-1}+1)+1, it cannot have the form 4r+1

ps: why are you trying to solve 2^n+5=m^2? it is not the original problem! but if you are really interested on it, you`ll find infinitely many solutions
 
What are the solutions to 2^n+5 = m^2? There is some real misunderstanding here.
 
hi robert

as for 2^n+5=m^2\ ==>\ 4(2^{n-2}+1)+1=m^2=4k(k+1)+1, in fact there is not infinitely many solutions as I prematurely said, n = 2 is the only solution, as k(k+1) is always even and 2^{n-2}+1 is even only for n = 2

going back to the original problem, I don`t understand your solution since m^m is never a square, could you please elaborate it more?

cheers
 
  • #10
robert Ihnot said:
What are the solutions to 2^n+5 = m^2?
m=4 and n=3 is the only solution.

EDIT: Nevermind, I misread the problem.
 
  • #11
al-mahed said:
hi robert

as for 2^n+5=m^2\ ==>\ 4(2^{n-2}+1)+1=m^2=4k(k+1)+1, in fact there is not infinitely many solutions as I prematurely said, n = 2 is the only solution, as k(k+1) is always even and 2^{n-2}+1 is even only for n = 2

going back to the original problem, I don`t understand your solution since m^m is never a square, could you please elaborate it more?

cheers

Such problems are normally worked by making the assumption there is a solution, i.e. that m*m is a perfect squre, that is an integral square.
 
  • #12
robert Ihnot said:
Such problems are normally worked by making the assumption there is a solution, i.e. that m*m is a perfect squre, that is an integral square.

Ok, let`s put into these terms: considering a natural n >0, and (hence!) an odd integer m, find solutions to 2^n+3=m^m, or prove there is any
 
  • #13
robert Ihnot said:
Such problems are normally worked by making the assumption there is a solution, i.e. that m*m is a perfect squre, that is an integral square.
Isn't m^m m to the mth power not m*m
 
  • #14
I see that, as is frequent, I did not read the original problem correctly.
 
  • #15
robert Ihnot said:
I see that, as is frequent, I did not read the original problem correctly.

it happens with me all the time! to avoid further mistakes we are talking about 2^n+3=m^m


I think we can work it out using a^{\varphi (m)}\equiv\ 1\mod m

as m is not divisible by 2, and \varphi (2^n)=2^{n-1} we have

\large\ m^{2^{n-1}}\equiv\ 1\mod 2^n, but \large\ m^m\equiv\ 3\mod 2^n, hence

\large\ m^{2^{n-1}}\equiv\ m^m-2\mod 2^n
 
Last edited:
  • #16
the font is too small, in case you cannot see the exponet properly I was trying to say that (now I modified some things):

\large\ (m^2)^{n-1}\equiv\ 1\ mod\ 2^n\ ==>\ m^{2^n}\equiv\ m^2 \ mod\ 2^n\ ==>\ m^{(m^m-3)}\equiv\ m^2\ mod\ 2^n

then m^2[m^{(m^m-5)}-1]\equiv\ 0\ mod\ 2^n\ ==>\ m^{(m^m-5)}\equiv\ 1\ mod\ 2^n

I don`t know exactly how to proceed from here, but m^m-5 cannot be a primitive root, otherwise it would imply (by the theorem of primitive roots) that m^m-5 | 2^{n-1}, and that`s not true for n> 1 since 2^n-2=m^m-5
 
  • #17
just to point ouy that I made a terrible mistake

\large\ m^{2^{n-1}}\equiv\ 1\ mod\ 2^n\ ==>\ m^{2^n}\equiv\ m^2 \ mod\ 2^n

is false, the correct is

\large\ m^{2^{n-1}}\equiv\ 1\ mod\ 2^n\ ==>\ m^{2^n}\equiv\ 1 \ mod\ 2^n

since (m^2)^{n-1}\neq\ m^{2^{n-1}]
 
  • #18
for instance 2^(2^3) = 2^8 = 256

and (2^2)^3 = 4^3 = 64
 
  • #19
2^n+3 = m^m, then 2^n +4 = m^m+1 = (m+1)(1-m+m^2-+++m^(m-1)). We know m is odd, and since the later part of the factorization is odd, we have 4 and only 4 divides m+1, so m==3 Mod 8.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K