Solving Air Drag Equation with Horizontal Velocity & Distance

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter vettett15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Air drag Drag
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving equations of motion for an object experiencing air drag, specifically focusing on the integration of velocity equations to obtain horizontal distance. Participants explore the implications of drag in both horizontal and vertical directions, questioning the assumptions made about drag coefficients and forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an equation for horizontal velocity and its integration to find horizontal distance, questioning the derivation of the integrated form.
  • Another participant clarifies that the integration must be evaluated at specific points and suggests using properties of logarithms to reconcile the two equations.
  • A participant expresses confusion over the treatment of drag forces in horizontal and vertical motions, noting that they are assumed to be the same despite differing conditions.
  • Some participants propose that the drag force should be treated separately for horizontal and vertical components, suggesting that the drag coefficients and areas may differ.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between total drag force and its components, with participants debating the correct formulation of these components based on velocity ratios.
  • One participant questions whether vertical drag can be ignored under the assumption that horizontal velocity is much greater than vertical velocity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the treatment of drag forces in horizontal and vertical directions, with no consensus reached on whether to use the same drag coefficients or to ignore vertical drag under certain conditions. The derivation of the equations and the integration process also remains a point of contention.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the dependence of drag coefficients on orientation and velocity, as well as the implications of integrating velocity equations without clear boundaries. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of the mathematical relationships involved.

vettett15
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I am working on deriving some equations of motion for an object with air drag.

I am using this site to help me: http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/flteqs.html

Here is my problem, at the bottom of that page they have this equation for horizontal velocity:

1. u = dx/dt = Vt^2 * Uo / (Vt^2 + g * Uo * t)

Then they integrate it to get horizontal distance

2. x = (Vt^2 / g) * ln( (Vt^2 + g * Uo * t) / Vt^2 )


When I take equation 1 and put it in MATLAB to integrate I get this

3. x = (Vt^2 / g) * ln( (Vt^2 + g * Uo * t) )

Now if I take either equation 3 or 2 and differentiate it, I will get equation 1.

How do they get equation 2 from integrating equation 1? Vt is terminal velocity by the way so that is just a constant. Uo is just the initial velocity. I assume in equation 1 when they took the integral on dx becomes x from x0 to x, x0 being 0 so you just get x. The right hand side you would get from t0 t, t0 being 0 so you are left with t.

Thanks,
Pete
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Formula 3 is the correct indefinite integral. You must evaluate it at both points (t2 and t1) and subtract. If t1=0 this does not mean that the value of integral is zero. Use the correct values of indefinite integral and log(a)-log(b)=log(a/b) and you will get the same result as eq. 2.
 
retarded I am

Thanks so much for the reply. I can't believe I missed that, I just assumed that everything was multiplied by t so the zero would wipe it all out. Thanks again.
 
another question

I also had another question, on the same website I sent you, they are getting equations of motion in the horizontal and vertical directions. My question is, for both the horizontal and vertical directions they are using the same drag.

If you thought of the horizontal and vertical velocities as independent of each other, the object travels upwards with a velocity and a drag force acting down on it, but the Cd and Area would be totally different than that of the horizontal drag.

Originally I thought to find the drag in the direction of travel and then just get the components for the horizontal and vertical directions, but the problem is that there isn't a constant theta, the direction of travel is always changing.

If I make the assumption that the horizontal velocity is >> than the vertical velocity, can I just ignore the vertical drag?
 
vettett15 said:
I also had another question, on the same website I sent you, they are getting equations of motion in the horizontal and vertical directions. My question is, for both the horizontal and vertical directions they are using the same drag.

They have this wrong. they have horizontal drag force:

\frac{C_d A \rho v_x^2 } {2}

and vertical drag force

\frac{C_d A \rho v_y^2 } {2}

but the total drag force is

\frac{C_d A \rho (v_x^2+v_y^2)} {2}

and the horizontal and vertical components are:

\frac{C_d A \rho v_x (v_x^2+v_y^2)} {2 \sqrt{v_x^2+v_y^2 }}

\frac{C_d A \rho v_y (v_x^2+v_y^2) } {2 \sqrt{v_x^2+v_y^2 }}
 
ok that makes since, going from what you have as total drag to the x and y drag components it looks like you just put a ratio of vx/v and vy/v in there. v equaling sqrt(vx^2+vy^2). That makes sense. Thanks
 
question

kamerling,

I was looking at your formula again and had a question. making Cd*A*p/2 equal to C to make this more simple.

You have total drag force as:

C*v^2 which is the same as C*(vx^2+vy^2)

Then you say the horizontal component is:

C*vx*(vx^2+vy^2)/sqrt(vx^2_vy2)

Which is essentially, correct me if I am wrong is saying:

C*v^2*cos(theta)

Where cos(theta) = vx/v = vx/sqrt(vx^2+vy^2)

But shouldn't it be instead:

C*(v*cos(theta))^2 which would just give what you have at the top of your post.

C*vx^2

and

C*vy^2

which if you say the x and y components of the drag force make up the total drag force:

(C*v^2)^2=(C*vx^2)^2+(C*vy^2)^2

C*v^4 = C*vx^4 + C*vy^4
 
vettett15 said:
kamerling,


C*v^2*cos(theta)

Where cos(theta) = vx/v = vx/sqrt(vx^2+vy^2)

But shouldn't it be instead:

C*(v*cos(theta))^2 which would just give what you have at the top of your post.

[/QUOTE}

No it shouldn't. If the combined force is C*V^2 , the components must be C*v^2*cos(theta) and C*v^2*sin(theta).
 
kamerling,


Thanks for the reply, I see what you are saying if you have a force in line with the direction of motion than that force is F. The components are Fcos(theta) and Fsin(theta). I am thinking along this line of thought. The horizontal and vertical motions are independent, so in the horizontal I have Cd*A*p/2*vx^2 and the vertical I have Cd*A*p/2*vy^2. The problem I see with my thinking is that Cd and A are different between the horizontal and vertical motions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K