Solving an Equation: Overcoming the r's

  • Level: Graduate 
  • Thread starter mhirschb
  • Start date
2 replies · 3K views · last reply
mhirschb
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I feel silly but I've been looking at this equation for a while and I don't fully understand the individual steps taken to go from the top line to the bottom line:
Handwritten-style textbook equations: B_z = (∇ × A)·n_z = (1/r) ∂(rA_θ)/∂r, followed by A_θ(r) = (1/r) ∫ from 0 to r of r′B_z(r′) dr′, with phrases highlighted in yellow.


I think I am getting caught up with all the r's in the equation. I recognize that on the second line "r" describes the point at which we are evaluating the MVP, and r' is the domain of r that we're integrating over.
I'm confused because it looks like they've taken the 1/r and changed it to r' on the other side.
 
The first equation obtains [itex]B_z[/itex] from [itex]A_\theta[/itex] bythe following steps:
  • Multiply by [itex]r[/itex].
  • Differentiate with respect to [itex]r[/itex].
  • Divide by [itex]r[/itex].

Therefore [itex]A_\theta[/itex] is obtained from [itex]B_z[/itex] by reversing these steps:
  • Multiply by [itex]r[/itex].
  • Integrate with respect to [itex]r[/itex]. This is done as a definite integral with lower limit 0, because any other choice of lower limit would make [itex]A_\theta[/itex] potentially infinite at [itex]r = 0[/itex]. This definite integration requires the introduction of [itex]r'[/itex] as a dummy variable of integration, because it is bad practise to use [itex]r[/itex] as both a limit of the integral and the dummy variable of integration.
  • Divide by [itex]r[/itex].
 
pasmith said:
The first equation obtains [itex]B_z[/itex] from [itex]A_\theta[/itex] bythe following steps:
  • Multiply by [itex]r[/itex].
  • Differentiate with respect to [itex]r[/itex].
  • Divide by [itex]r[/itex].

Therefore [itex]A_\theta[/itex] is obtained from [itex]B_z[/itex] by reversing these steps:
  • Multiply by [itex]r[/itex].
  • Integrate with respect to [itex]r[/itex]. This is done as a definite integral with lower limit 0, because any other choice of lower limit would make [itex]A_\theta[/itex] potentially infinite at [itex]r = 0[/itex]. This definite integration requires the introduction of [itex]r'[/itex] as a dummy variable of integration, because it is bad practise to use [itex]r[/itex] as both a limit of the integral and the dummy variable of integration.
  • Divide by [itex]r[/itex].
Ah! It makes so much sense now I wanna facepalm!

Thank you for the explanation. It became clear when I needed to introduce the dummy variable r'.