I Solving an equation with a parameter and a derivative

AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation involving the second derivative, one can rearrange it to identify the parameter k or substitute the found second derivative into the equation to solve for k. The equation can be expressed as d²y/dx² + k√x = 4, allowing for the identification of k. Alternatively, substituting the second derivative into the equation simplifies the process. The thread was closed due to repeated violations of posting guidelines regarding homework questions.
homeworkhelpls
Messages
41
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
For 3(i)(b) does anyone know how to find the value of k?
1676625636034.png
idk how to start after finding the second derivative
 

Attachments

  • 1676625699080.png
    1676625699080.png
    4.6 KB · Views: 134
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You have
$$
\frac{d^2y}{dx^2} = 4 - \frac{15}{4} \sqrt{x}
$$
You can either rearrange that equation so that it looks like
$$
\frac{d^2y}{dx^2} + k \sqrt{x} = 4
$$
and identify what ##k## is, or use a more robust approach by substituting the ##\frac{d^2y}{dx^2}## you have found into that second equation,
$$
\left(4 - \frac{15}{4} \sqrt{x} \right) + k \sqrt{x} = 4
$$
and solve for ##k##.
 
Thread closed. The OP has been warned five times previously that homework-type questions must be posted in one of the forum sections devoted to homework questions.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top