Solving an equation with respect to y, where y is twice [hard]

  • Thread starter Thread starter Science4ver
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the equation X(y) = y/(t*(sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1/p for y, particularly focusing on the condition X(y) = 0. Participants are exploring algebraic manipulations and common denominators in the context of this equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of a common denominator and the implications of setting the numerator to zero. There are attempts to isolate y and questions about the correctness of algebraic steps taken, particularly regarding the presence of terms and their manipulation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's algebraic processes. Some guidance has been offered regarding the correct approach to finding a common denominator and the need to square both sides of the equation to eliminate the square root. There is recognition of algebraic mistakes, and participants are encouraged to clarify their expressions.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion over the algebraic steps and the presence of terms in the equation. There is an acknowledgment of potential typos and the need for careful manipulation of the equation to arrive at the correct form for solving y.

Science4ver
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given the following equation

X(y) = y/(t*(sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1/p

How would I go solving that equation X(y) = 0 with respect to y?


The Attempt at a Solution



I can choose a commen dominator called p*t*(b^2+y^2)

But I when end up with

((y*p - t*p*(sqrt(y^2+b^2))/(p*t(b^2+y^2)) = 0

How would you guys surgest I proceed from where in order to isolate y?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Science4ver said:

Homework Statement



Given the following equation

X(y) = y/(t*(sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1/p

How would I go solving that equation X(y) = 0 with respect to y?


The Attempt at a Solution



I can choose a commen dominator called p*t*(b^2+y^2)

But I when end up with

((y*p - t*p*(sqrt(y^2+b^2))/(p*t(b^2+y^2)) = 0

How would you guys surgest I proceed from where in order to isolate y?

Now that you have it over a common denominator, if f(y)/g(y)=0, then f(y)=0.
 
Dick said:
Now that you have it over a common denominator, if f(y)/g(y)=0, then f(y)=0.

Thank you for your answer.

That implies that I need to solve the equation

(y*p - t*p*(sqrt(y^2+b^2)) = 0

Which allows me to arrive at the solution (using my graphical calculator)

y = -b * p *(sqrt(-1/(p^2-1)

But solution is suppose to be:

y = b/(sqrt(p/t +1) * sqrt(p/t-1))

I can't quite comprehend which step I need to use arrive at that solution. But cause to the best of my knowledge there aren't any variables which I substitute in order to arrive at that solution.

Any idears?
 
You aren't going to get there by being sloppy and relying on a calculator.

Science4ver said:
Thank you for your answer.

That implies that I need to solve the equation

(y*p - t*p*(sqrt(y^2+b^2)) = 0

There's an extra 'p' in that equation.

Science4ver said:
Which allows me to arrive at the solution (using my graphical calculator)

y = -b * p *(sqrt(-1/(p^2-1)

Extra 'p' here also, and what happened to the 't'? I think you should fix those up and figure out how your calculator found that expression before continuing.
 
Dick said:
You aren't going to get there by being sloppy and relying on a calculator.



There's an extra 'p' in that equation.



Extra 'p' here also, and what happened to the 't'? I think you should fix those up and figure out how your calculator found that expression before continuing.

You are right. I see now the equation I am suppose to solve is y/(t*(sqrt(y^2+b^2))-1 = 0

Is it correct now?
 
Science4ver said:
You are right. I see now the equation I am suppose to solve is y/(t*(sqrt(y^2+b^2))-1 = 0

Is it correct now?

No, the p is gone. Your first step of putting it over a common denominator is wrong. It happened when you expressed the term 1/p with that common denominator.
 
Last edited:
So I am lost here :( What would you surgest I do as a first step with original equation? I can add 1/p on both sides I see that and next add the denominator on both sides. But what next?
 
Science4ver said:
So I am lost here :( What would you surgest I do as a first step with original equation? I can add 1/p on both sides I see that and next add the denominator on both sides. But what next?

The strategy is to do what you were doing. Express X(y) over a common denominator. But do it right.
 
Dick said:
The strategy is to do what you were doing. Express X(y) over a common denominator. But do it right.

I get that now but the only commen denominator I can deduce is my pee size brain is :)

p*t*(b^2+y^2))

But what I get from what you are saying is that denominator is wrong?
 
  • #10
Science4ver said:
I get that now but the only commen denominator I can deduce is my pee size brain is :)

p*t*(b^2+y^2))

But what I get from what you are saying is that denominator is wrong?

I would use p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2) as a common denominator. Actually that's what I thought you were using and just forgetting the 'sqrt' part. If you have two fraction a/b-c/d you can always use c*d as a common denominator. What do you get expressing a/b-c/d over a common denominator?
 
  • #11
Dick said:
No. Denominator is fine. You got ((y*p - t*p*(sqrt(y^2+b^2))/(p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)) = 0. One of the terms in the numerator of that expression is wrong.

Okay, Glad I am not totally stupid then :)

So any if I take the original equation : y/(t*(sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1/p

and use the commen denominator p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)

I arrive at

py/(p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2) - (t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)/(p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2) =

y/(t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1 = 0 ?

But if that the right cause of action I still have y twice with the term y^2 and y, and no matter what I do I can't arrive at the result that

y = b/(sqrt(p/t +1) * sqrt(p/t-1)) :( So I understand I must be doing something wrong and there possibly a term which can be rewritten to arrive that the right result for y, but I can't see which one :(
 
  • #12
Science4ver said:
Okay, Glad I am not totally stupid then :)

So any if I take the original equation : y/(t*(sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1/p

and use the commen denominator p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)

I arrive at

py/(p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2) - (p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)/(p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2) =

y/(t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1 = 0 ?

But if that the right cause of action I still have y twice with the term y^2 and y, and no matter what I do I can't arrive at the result that

y = b/(sqrt(p/t +1) * sqrt(p/t-1)) :( So I understand I must be doing something wrong and there possibly a term which can be rewritten to arrive that the right result for y, but I can't see which one :(

Sorry, I've been assuming that some of the things you were writing were typos, when they are actually algebra mistakes. I revised the post you quoted. I'm asking you to show me how to put a/b-c/d over a common denominator.
 
  • #13
Science4ver said:
py/(p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2) - (t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)/(p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2) =

y/(t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1 = 0 ?
You confused me dropping the '0' at the end of the first of those two lines.
You have dropped a p in getting to the last line.
Don't collect everything over on the left like that. Leave it as py = (t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)).
You next step is to get rid of the square root. How can you do that?
 
  • #14
Dick said:
Sorry, I've been assuming that some of the things you were writing were typos, when they are actually algebra mistakes. I revised the post you quoted. I'm asking you to show me how to put a/b-c/d over a common denominator.

Thats easy a/b - c/d = ad/bd - bc/bd = (ad-bc)/bd

But regarding the other expression I attempted now 10 times if I take my equation

X(y) = y/(t*(sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1/p = 0

and use the commen denominator (p*t(b^2+y^2))

I end up with the expression:

py/(pt*sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - (t(b^2+y^2))
/(p*t(b^2+y^2)) = ?

I must have messed up somewhere :( ?
 
  • #15
Science4ver said:
Thats easy a/b - c/d = ad/bd - bc/bd = (ad-bc)/bd

But regarding the other expression I attempted now 10 times if I take my equation

X(y) = y/(t*(sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1/p = 0

and use the commen denominator (p*t(b^2+y^2))

I end up with the expression:

py/(pt*sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - (t(b^2+y^2))
/(p*t(b^2+y^2)) = ?

I must have messed up somewhere :( ?

a/b-c/d=(ad-bc)/bd is correct. You are messing up the second part. Actually, looking at it, it's not messed up - but you don't have a common denominator. Just apply the correct pattern with a=y, b=t*(sqrt(b^2+y^2)), c=1 and d=p.
 
Last edited:
  • #16
Science4ver said:

Homework Statement



Given the following equation

X(y) = y/(t*(sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1/p

How would I go solving that equation X(y) = 0 with respect to y?


The Attempt at a Solution



I can choose a commen dominator called p*t*(b^2+y^2)

But I when end up with

((y*p - t*p*(sqrt(y^2+b^2))/(p*t(b^2+y^2)) = 0

How would you guys surgest I proceed from where in order to isolate y?

Your equation is
[tex]\frac{y}{t\sqrt{b^2+y^2}}-\frac{1}{p} = 0 \Rightarrow \frac{y}{t\sqrt{b^2+y^2}} = \frac{1}{p}[/tex]
Square both sides to get
[tex]\frac{y^2}{t^2(b^2+y^2)} = \frac{1}{p^2}[/tex]
Solve for ##y^2##; in other words, let ##y^2 = z## and solve for ##z## from the simple equation
[tex]\frac{z}{b^2 t^2 + t^2 z} = \frac{1}{p^2}[/tex]
 
  • #17
Yes, I know there is an easier way to attack this. You can also do it by putting everything over a common denominator and going from there. I was trying to diagose what was going so wrong with the OP's attempt to put things over a common denominator. Sometimes you have to do that. Here, it's optional.
 
  • #18
Ray Vickson said:
Your equation is
[tex]\frac{y}{t\sqrt{b^2+y^2}}-\frac{1}{p} = 0 \Rightarrow \frac{y}{t\sqrt{b^2+y^2}} = \frac{1}{p}[/tex]
Square both sides to get
[tex]\frac{y^2}{t^2(b^2+y^2)} = \frac{1}{p^2}[/tex]
Solve for ##y^2##; in other words, let ##y^2 = z## and solve for ##z## from the simple equation
[tex]\frac{z}{b^2 t^2 + t^2 z} = \frac{1}{p^2}[/tex]
thank and then I should be able to arrive at the solution ?
But if I solve the rewritten equation with respect to z I get z=-b^2*t^2/(t^2-p^2)?

I am no closer to y = b/(sqrt(p/t +1) * sqrt(p/t-1)) which is suppose to be the solution for original equation.

Which is still no closer to y = b/(sqrt(p/t +1) * sqrt(p/t-1))
 
Last edited:
  • #19
Science4ver said:
I get z=-b^2*t^2/(t^2-p^2)?

I am no closer to y = b/(sqrt(p/t +1) * sqrt(p/t-1)) which is suppose to be the solution for original equation.
Yes you are... almost there in fact. Just a little more juggling.
 
  • #20
haruspex said:
Yes you are... almost there in fact. Just a little more juggling.

I got it now :D
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K