Solving an Euler differential equation

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the differential equation (2x+1)²y'' + (4x+2)y' - 4y = x² using a substitution method. The user applies the substitution t = ln|2x+1| and derives the transformed equation, ultimately finding the homogeneous and particular solutions. However, there is confusion regarding a term in the original equation, where a participant points out a potential error in the sign of the term -4y, suggesting it should be +4y for the left-hand side to represent an exact second derivative. Despite checking for typos, the user confirms their original equation is correct, leading to uncertainty about the solvability of the problem. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in solving this type of differential equation.
member 587159

Homework Statement



Solve the differential equation ##(2x+1)^2y'' + (4x+2)y' - 4y = x^2##
Can someone verify whether my solution is correct?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



We perform the substitution ##t = \ln|2x+1|##. Then, ##e^t = |2x+1|## and ##x = \pm(e^t -1)/2##

Without loss of generality, let's solve the equation for ##x = (e^t-1)/2##. (the other case is analogue)

We find ##\frac{dy}{dx} = 2e^{-t}\frac{dy}{dt}##

##\frac{d^2y}{dx^2} = -4e^{-2t}\frac{dy}{dt}+4e^{-2t}\frac{d^2y}{dt^2}##

Hence, the differential equation becomes:

##16y'' - 16y = (e^t-1)^2##

This is a linear differential equation with constant coefficients:

The homogeneous is given by:

##y_h = c_1e^t + c_2e^{-t}##

Let's apply variation of the constants to find ##y_p##, the particular solution.

##y_p = c_1(t)e^t + c_2(t)e^{-t}##

Then, we can find the functions ##c_1'## and ##c_2'## as solutions of the system:

##\begin{cases}c_1'(t)e^t + c_2'(t)e^{-t} = 0\\c_1'(t)e^t - c_2'(t)e^{-t} = (e^t-1)^2\end{cases}##

##\iff c_1'(t) = -c_2'(t) = \frac{(e^t-1)^2}{2e^t}##

Hence:

##c_1(t) = e^t/2 - t - e^{-t}/2 = -c_2(t)## (if we set the constant of integration to ##0##)

Hence, the solution is given by:

##y = y_p + y_h = c_1e^t + c_2e^{-t} -1 + 1/2e^{2t}-te^t + 1/2e^{-2t}+te^{-t}##

And by substituting back:

##y(x) = c_1(2x+1) + c_2\frac{1}{2x+1} + \frac{(2x+1)^2}{2} - \ln(2x+1)(2x+1) - 1 + \frac{1}{2(2x+1)^2} + \frac{\ln(2x+1)}{2x+1}##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Math_QED said:

Homework Statement



Solve the differential equation ##(2x+1)^2y'' + (4x+2)y' - 4y = x^2##
Can someone verify whether my solution is correct?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



We perform the substitution ##t = \ln|2x+1|##. Then, ##e^t = |2x+1|## and ##x = \pm(e^t -1)/2##

Without loss of generality, let's solve the equation for ##x = (e^t-1)/2##. (the other case is analogue)

We find ##\frac{dy}{dx} = 2e^{-t}\frac{dy}{dt}##

##\frac{d^2y}{dx^2} = -4e^{-2t}\frac{dy}{dt}+4e^{-2t}\frac{d^2y}{dt^2}##

Hence, the differential equation becomes:

##16y'' - 16y = (e^t-1)^2##

This is a linear differential equation with constant coefficients:

The homogeneous is given by:

##y_h = c_1e^t + c_2e^{-t}##

Let's apply variation of the constants to find ##y_p##, the particular solution.

##y_p = c_1(t)e^t + c_2(t)e^{-t}##

Then, we can find the functions ##c_1'## and ##c_2'## as solutions of the system:

##\begin{cases}c_1'(t)e^t + c_2'(t)e^{-t} = 0\\c_1'(t)e^t - c_2'(t)e^{-t} = (e^t-1)^2\end{cases}##

##\iff c_1'(t) = -c_2'(t) = \frac{(e^t-1)^2}{2e^t}##

Hence:

##c_1(t) = e^t/2 - t - e^{-t}/2 = -c_2(t)## (if we set the constant of integration to ##0##)

Hence, the solution is given by:

##y = y_p + y_h = c_1e^t + c_2e^{-t} -1 + 1/2e^{2t}-te^t + 1/2e^{-2t}+te^{-t}##

And by substituting back:

##y(x) = c_1(2x+1) + c_2\frac{1}{2x+1} + \frac{(2x+1)^2}{2} - \ln(2x+1)(2x+1) - 1 + \frac{1}{2(2x+1)^2} + \frac{\ln(2x+1)}{2x+1}##
What is preventing you from putting your formula for ##y(x)## into the DE to test if it works?
 
Math_QED said:
##\begin{cases}c_1'(t)e^t + c_2'(t)e^{-t} = 0\\c_1'(t)e^t - c_2'(t)e^{-t} = (e^t-1)^2\end{cases}##

##\iff c_1'(t) = -c_2'(t) = \frac{(e^t-1)^2}{2e^t}##
This doesn't look right.
 
  • Like
Likes member 587159
vela said:
This doesn't look right.

Thanks for pointing out!
 
What a pity that last LHS term is –4y instead of 4y, in which case the LHS would have been an exact second derivative. Sure you copied it out right.? :oldsmile:
 
  • Like
Likes member 587159
epenguin said:
What a pity that last LHS term is –4y instead of 4y, in which case the LHS would have been an exact second derivative. Sure you copied it out right.? :oldsmile:

I just checked and I made no typo, unfortunately.
 
Pity they didn't ask good question. I can't see any way to hammer that one into something so nice. :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
919
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K