Solving Collision of Billiard Balls: Speed and Direction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a collision between two billiard balls, where one ball is shot east and the other west, resulting in a glancing collision that deflects the second ball north. The objective is to determine the speed and direction of the first ball after the collision.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conservation of momentum and the implications of the collision setup. There are attempts to calculate the final velocity of the first ball using different equations and considerations of direction.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring various calculations and questioning the assumptions regarding direction and components of velocity. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of the Pythagorean theorem and the need to consider both x and y components in the calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is confusion regarding the direction of the angle and how it should be expressed. Participants are also noting the constraints of the homework, including the number of attempts allowed for submission.

aligass2004
Messages
236
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Similar to the other one...
On billiard ball is shot east at 2.6m/s. A second, identical billiard ball is shot west at .8m/s. The balls have a glancing collision, not a head-on collision, deflecting the second ball by 90 degrees and sending it north at 1.58m/s. What are the speed and direction of the first ball after the collision?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I tried using (P1x)f + (P2x)f = (P1x)i + (P2x)i ----> (m1xv1x)f + (m2xv2x)f = (m1xv1x)i + (m2xv2x)i. I tried solving for (v1x)f. I assumed since the billiard balls are identical that the mass cancels out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yes, the masses cancel. Looks like you have the right idea. can you show your calculations?
 
V1f = V1i + V2i - V2f
= 2.6 + .8 - 1.58 = 1.82
 
aligass2004 said:
V1f = V1i + V2i - V2f
= 2.6 + .8 - 1.58 = 1.82

but 1.58 is not in the x-direction... what is the Vxf of the second ball?
 
I didn't realize that. The Vxf of the 2nd ball is zero since it isn't moving in the x direction anymore.
 
aligass2004 said:
I didn't realize that. The Vxf of the 2nd ball is zero since it isn't moving in the x direction anymore.

exactly.
 
Ok, so I tried V1f = 2.6 + .8 = 3.4, but that wasn't right.
 
aligass2004 said:
Ok, so I tried V1f = 2.6 + .8 = 3.4, but that wasn't right.

Oh, sorry I didn't notice... you should have -0.8, not 0.8.

use east positive. west negative. north positive. south negative.
 
Alright, this time I tried V1f = 2.6 - .8 = 1.8, but it again wasn't right.
 
  • #10
aligass2004 said:
Alright, this time I tried V1f = 2.6 - .8 = 1.8, but it again wasn't right.

that's only in the east west direction... you also need to consider the north south direction.

I thought the question was asking for the components separately. I just noticed now it only asks for speed. I'm sorry... wish I realized before you submitted again...

get the north south component, same way you got the east/west component... then get the speed using pythagorean theorem.
 
  • #11
Blah...freaking components. Ok, for the north/south component, V1f = V1i + V2i - V2f -----> V1f = 0 + 0 -1.58. There's only one problem with using the pythagorean theroem. With the last problem, I figured out the angle really easily since both components were the same. I don't know the angle with this one.
 
  • #12
aligass2004 said:
Blah...freaking components. Ok, for the north/south component, V1f = V1i + V2i - V2f -----> V1f = 0 + 0 -1.58. There's only one problem with using the pythagorean theroem. With the last problem, I figured out the angle really easily since both components were the same. I don't know the angle with this one.

you can get the angle using arctan(vy/vx). be careful before you submit though... how do they ask for the angle? Do they want the angle from the east axis etc..?
 
  • #13
They ask for degrees in the south east direction.
 
  • #14
So the angle would be -41.276 degrees, but it would be positive since they want it in the SE direction, right?
 
  • #15
aligass2004 said:
So the angle would be -41.276 degrees, but it would be positive since they want it in the SE direction, right?

yeah, but it is East 41.276 degrees South...

Do they just say SE... because it could be east of south or south of east... that makes a difference...
 
  • #16
It says south of east
 
  • #17
aligass2004 said:
It says south of east

Cool. Then 41.276 is right.
 
  • #18
Ok so the angle was right, but I don't know the velocity...and I'm out of tries. I tried the -1.58 = vcos(theta).
 
  • #19
aligass2004 said:
Ok so the angle was right, but I don't know the velocity...and I'm out of tries. I tried the -1.58 = vcos(theta).

The 1.58 is the sin. so vsin(41.276) = 1.58. v = 2.395m/s.

But it's best to just use the pythagorean theorem when you need the speed... you don't need to worry about the angles. sqrt(1.58^2 + (1.8)^2) = 2.395m/s
 
  • #20
Alright.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K