Solving Complex Eigenvector for (-1 + i \sqrt{11})

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding an eigenvector corresponding to the complex eigenvalue -1 + i √11 for a given matrix A. Participants are examining the relationship between the eigenvalue and the resulting eigenvector, exploring algebraic manipulations and potential errors in calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the method of substituting the eigenvalue into the matrix and solving the resulting equations. There are mentions of algebraic mistakes and the implications of obtaining the zero vector as a solution. Some participants suggest simplifying expressions and checking for scalar multiples of eigenvectors.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and corrections to each other's approaches. There is recognition of algebraic errors and the equivalence of different eigenvector forms. No explicit consensus has been reached, but productive guidance has been shared regarding the nature of eigenvectors.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of avoiding the zero vector as a solution and the flexibility in choosing scalar multiples of eigenvectors. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity introduced by the imaginary component of the eigenvalue.

hotcommodity
Messages
434
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Complex Eigenvector

I need to solve for an eigenvector using the complex eigenvalue -1 + i \sqrt{11}. I have a matrix:

A = \left(\begin{array}{cc}-3 & -5 \\3 & 1\end{array}\right)

From the equation A \vec{V} = \lambda \vec{V}, where \vec{V} = (x, y) I get :

-3x - 5y = -1x + i \sqrt{11}x

3x + y = -1y + i \sqrt{11}y

Which gives:

-2x - i \sqrt{11}x - 5y = 0

3x + 2y - i \sqrt{11}y = 0

When I solve this system for x and y, I get a solution of (0, 0). The book agrees with the eigenvalue that I found, but has an eigenvector solution of (-2 + i \sqrt{11}, 3). Can anyone spot what I'm doing wrong?

Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's much easier to just plug in the eigenvalue to the matrix

\begin{pmatrix} -3 - \lambda & -5 \\ 3 & 1 - \lambda\end{pmatrix}

and then solve it that way.

Also, switch the first and second rows, again to make it easier. You're equations are correct, and they shouldn't come up with 0,0.
 
Last edited:
If I solve the first equation for y, I get
y = -\frac{1}{5} (2 + \mathrm{i}\sqrt{11}) x
Then plugging this into the second equation gives an equation just for x. Don't forget to simplify the prefactor as much as possible, then solve for x. You'll see that though (x, y) = (0, 0) is a possibility (which you don't want, because you want it to be an eigenvector), but there are also others for which x is non-zero.

Also note, that once you found one eigenvector, you can take any multiple and it will be an eigenvector again. So you can multiply the whole thing by a factor to make the vector look nicer (e.g. if you'd get (12/\sqrt{1 + x}, \sqrt{1 - x}) I'd multiply by \sqrt{1 + x} and write it as (12, \sqrt{x^2 + 1})).
 
Thanks for the replies. I realize what I was doing wrong (to some degree). I made an algebraic mistake along the way. My answer wasn't the same answer that the book had, but it worked such that A \vec{V} = \lambda \vec{V}, which makes me assume that my answer was a multiple of the books answer.
 
That's easily checked. What was your answer?
 
I used the eigenvalue \lambda = 2 + i \sqrt{11} to obtain an eigenvector of:

\vec{V_0} = \begin{pmatrix} 5\\ -2 - i \sqrt{11}\end{pmatrix}

As was noted, this works such that A \vec{V} = \lambda \vec{V}.
 
And as I said, they are multiples of each other, namely:
\begin{pmatrix} -2 + i \sqrt{11} \\ 3 \end{pmatrix} = \frac{i \sqrt{11} - 2}{5} \cdot \begin{pmatrix} 5 \\ - 2 - i \sqrt{11} \end{pmatrix}

So your answer is equivalent to that in the book, only they chose a multiple to make the second component look simple, while you make the first component look nice.
 
CompuChip said:
And as I said, they are multiples of each other, namely:
\begin{pmatrix} -2 + i \sqrt{11} \\ 3 \end{pmatrix} = \frac{i \sqrt{11} - 2}{5} \cdot \begin{pmatrix} 5 \\ - 2 - i \sqrt{11} \end{pmatrix}

So your answer is equivalent to that in the book, only they chose a multiple to make the second component look simple, while you make the first component look nice.

I see, I appreciate the help. Thank you.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K