Solving Convexity of Open Disc Problem in Complex Plane

  • Thread starter Thread starter e(ho0n3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Disc
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the convexity of an open disc in the complex plane, specifically defined as D = {z : |z - w| < r}. Participants are exploring geometric and analytical approaches to demonstrate that the line segment between any two points within the disc remains entirely within the disc.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using the triangle inequality to analyze the properties of points within the disc. There are attempts to express the line segment analytically and questions about how to ensure that the distance from any point on the segment to the center remains less than r.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the use of the triangle inequality and have redefined variables to clarify their reasoning. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of these mathematical expressions, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of specific values for w and r in some posts, which may influence the generality of the discussion. Participants are also navigating the complexity of the problem without fully resolving the analytical proof.

e(ho0n3
Messages
1,349
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Convexity of Open Disc

I'm trying to prove that the open disc in the complex plane given by D = {z : |z - w| < r} is convex.

Let p and q be two points in D. The line segment from p to q is L = {(1 - t)p + tq : 0 <= t <= 1}. Let u be a point an arbitrary point on this segment. If I can show that |u - w| < r, I'm done.

This is essentially a geometry problem. There's probably a proposition in Euclid's Elements that the line segment from any two points on the circle is contained in the circle. How do you show this analytically though?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the triangle inequality on w(t)=|(1-t)p+tq|. The result is a linear function in t. |w(0)|=|p|<=1 and |w(1)|=|q|<=1. Hence?
 
Using the triangle inequality is a great idea:

|p| - |w| < |p - w| < r so |p| < r + |w|. Similarly |q| < r + |w|.

|(1 - t)p + tq - w| <= (1 - t)|p| + t|q| + |w| < (1 - t)(r + |w|) + t(r + |w|) + |w| = r + 2|w| so (1 - t)|p| + t|q| - |w| < r.

However, since (1 - t)|p| + t|q| - |w| <= |(1 - t)p + tq - w|, I don't know if the latter is greater than r.
 
I can how my first reply could be a little difficult to digest. I was taking w=0 and r=1 and not telling you that. Furthermore I meant to define u(t)=p(1-t)+qt to fit in with your notation better. Let's try that again. u(t)-w=(p-w)(1-t)+(q-w)t, right? So |u(t)-w|<=|p-w|(1-t)+|q-w|t. Can you finish it from there?
 
Ah, I see. Writing u(t)-w as (p-w)(1-t)+(q-w)t is the right idea. It never occurred to me. From then on, it trivially follows that |u - w| < r. Thanks a lot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
897
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K