Solving Cubic Equations with Cardano's Method: A Complete Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physicsissuef
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cubic
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 3K views
Physicsissuef
Messages
908
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the solutions of:

[tex]x^3-3x-2=0[/tex]

using the Cardano's method.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]x=u+v[/tex]

[tex](u+v)^3-3(u+v)-2=0[/tex]

[tex]u^3+v^3+(u+v)(3uv-3)-2=0[/tex]

[tex]3uv-3=0[/tex]

[tex]uv=1[/tex]

[tex]u^3v^3=1[/tex]

[tex]u^3+v^3=2[/tex]

[tex]u^3=v^3=1[/tex]

Now [tex]u=v=\sqrt[3]{1}[/tex].

I found u and v with [tex]z=\sqrt[3]{1}[/tex] (using complex numbers).

[tex]u=v=1[/tex]

[tex]u=v=\frac{-1}{2}+i\frac{sqrt{3}}{2}[/tex]

[tex]u=v=\frac{-1}{2}-i\frac{sqrt{3}}{2}[/tex]

x=u+v

[tex]x_1=2[/tex]

[tex]x_2=-1+i\sqrt{3}[/tex]

[tex]x_3=-1-i\sqrt{3}[/tex]

I substitute above and something is wrong. Where is the error?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
there may be a better way out..observinf that if [tex]f(x)=x^3-3x-2[/tex].
clearly [tex]f(-1)=0[/tex]
satisfies the eqn...hence
[tex](x+1)[/tex] is a factor of [tex]f(x)[/tex].
Now use division and get [tex]f(x)[/tex] in the form of factors and put the other factor(other than [tex]x+1[/tex])
to be zero and solve for
[tex]x[/tex]
 
Yes, I know that there are few ways, but I need to solve it with Cardanos. Please help.
 
Physicsissuef said:

Homework Statement



Find the solutions of:

[tex]x^3-3x-2=0[/tex]

using the Cardano's method.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]x=u+v[/tex]

[tex](u+v)^3-3(u+v)-2=0[/tex]

[tex]u^3+v^3+(u+v)(3uv-3)-2=0[/tex]

[tex]3uv-3=0[/tex]

[tex]uv=1[/tex]

[tex]u^3v^3=1[/tex]

[tex]u^3+v^3=2[/tex]

[tex]u^3=v^3=1[/tex]
?? I don't see how this follows directly, although it is true. Since you have defined u and v such that uv= 1, you have v= 1/u and so [itex]u^3+ 1/u^3= 2[/itex]. Multiplying both sides by u3, you get the quadratic (in u3) (u3)2- 2(u3)+ 1= 0 which does give u3= 1 or u3= -1 as roots.

Now [tex]u=v=\sqrt[3]{1}[/tex].
No. This is your error. It does not follow from u3= v3 that u= v. Only that they are both cube roots of 3. And, as you note below, there are 3 of those.

I found u and v with [tex]z=\sqrt[3]{1}[/tex] (using complex numbers).

[tex]u=v=1[/tex]

[tex]u=v=\frac{-1}{2}+i\frac{sqrt{3}}{2}[/tex]

[tex]u=v=\frac{-1}{2}-i\frac{sqrt{3}}{2}[/tex]
You do NOT know, as I said, that u= v. You know, rather, that uv= 1 so v= 1/u.
If
[tex]u= \frac{-1+ i\sqrt{3}}{2}[/tex]
then
[tex]v= \frac{2}{-1+ i\sqrt{3}}[/tex]
rationalize the denominator by multiplying both numerator and denominator by [itex]-1+ i\sqrt{3}[/itex] and you get
[itex]\frac{-1- i\sqrt{3}}{2}[/itex]
the other non-real root of z3= 1.

Now, x= u+ v gives x= -1 which is correct. The three roots of x3- 3x- 2= 0 are 2, -1, -1.

x=u+v

[tex]x_1=2[/tex]

[tex]x_2=-1+i\sqrt{3}[/tex]

[tex]x_3=-1-i\sqrt{3}[/tex]

I substitute above and something is wrong. Where is the error?
 
So, first I found the 3 solutions of u , and then substitute in uv=1, I get v and then substitute in x=u+v, right?
 
Ok, thanks. But why I read that also suming [itex]u_1+v_1=x_1[/tex], will work if I found [itex]v_1[/itex], by using complex algebra?[/itex]