Solving Differential Equation with Laguerre Polynomials

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 4K views
Logarythmic
Messages
277
Reaction score
0
What differential equation does

[tex]\phi_n (x) := e^{-x/2} L_n (x)[/tex]

solve? [tex]L_n[/tex] is a Laguerre polynomial.

Please give me a hint on this one. I haven't got a clue where to start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Laguerre differential equation is

[tex]xy'' + (1 - x)y' + ny = 0[/tex]

and [tex]L_n (x)[/tex] is a solution to this but my [tex]\phi_n (x)[/tex] is not a solution to the Laguerre equation, is it?
I know that [tex]\phi_n (x)[/tex] should solve a self adjoint differential equation but I don't think the Laguerre eq. is?
 
Find [itex]\phi',\phi''[/itex] in terms of the derivatives of L and use the differential equation relating the derivatives of L to get a DE relating the derivatives of [itex]\phi[/itex].
 
Ok, so then I get

[tex]x \phi_n^{''} (x) + (1-x) \phi_n^{'} + (n + \frac{1}{2} - \frac{x}{4}) \phi_n (x) = 0[/tex]

but this isn't self-adjoint?
In my case, self-adjoint means it can be written in the form

[tex]\frac{d}{dx} (p(x) \frac{d}{dx} \phi_n (x) ) + q(x) \phi_n (x)[/tex]
 
I made a mistake. The equation I get is

[tex]x \phi_n^{''} + \phi_n^{'} + (n + \frac{1}{2} - \frac{x}{4}) \phi_n = 0[/tex]

and this is indeed self-adjoint. Thanks for your help!