Solving differential equations.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving two differential equations: (1) x²y' = xy + x²e^(y/x) and (2) x²y' + 2xy = 5y³. Participants explore methods for finding solutions, noting that these equations are not separable and may require integrating factors to achieve exact form.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various substitutions, including y = Vx for the first equation, and consider rewriting the second equation in a different form. There is an exploration of implicit solutions and the challenges of finding integrating factors. Some participants express uncertainty about the implications of their manipulations and the correctness of their results.

Discussion Status

The conversation has progressed with several participants offering insights and alternative approaches. While some solutions have been proposed, there is no explicit consensus on the correctness of the results, particularly for the second equation. Participants continue to question assumptions and clarify steps in their reasoning.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the equations and the potential for singular solutions, particularly in relation to initial conditions. There is an acknowledgment of the challenges posed by discontinuities in the solutions.

STEMucator
Homework Helper
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
140

Homework Statement



I came across two, not so obvious DEs that have stumped me abit.

(1) x2y' = xy + x2ey/x
(2) x2y' + 2xy = 5y3

Homework Equations



I know these are not separable, and more than likely require an integrating factor to put them into exact form so I can integrate them that way.

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm sort of stuck on both of them.

For (1) I divided through by x2 to get y' = y/x + ey/x which further yields y' - y/x = ey/x which is sadly implicit in nature and not solvable by means of a regular integrating factor.

Its the same for (2), once again I divide through by x2 to attain y' + (2/x)y = 5y3/x2 which is once again implicit and not solvable by regular means.

I know I probably need to put these into exact form somehow, but I'm having trouble putting them into the form :

[itex]M(x, y) + N(x, y) \frac{dy}{dx} = 0[/itex] So I can solve for an integrating factor [itex]\mu (x)[/itex] which satisfies :

[tex]\frac{\frac{∂M(x, y)}{∂y} - \frac{∂N(x, y)}{∂x}}{N(x, y)} = \frac{d\mu}{dx}[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first one, try a substitution of y=Vx.
 
For the second one, observe x^2y' + 2xy = (x^2y)'.
 
voko said:
For the second one, observe x^2y' + 2xy = (x^2y)'.

I didn't know what substitution was, but I learned it quickly and I managed to get the solution to the first equation to be :

-e-y/x = ln|x| + c which I decided to obviously leave implicit as no real solutions of y would exist.

As for the second equation, voko you mentioned I could re-write this as :

d/dx [x2y] = 5y3 I'm not sure how this would help though?
 
What is in square brackets is another function u(x). Can you express y via x and u?

Speaking of the first one, consider the case when c is a large negative constant.
 
voko said:
What is in square brackets is another function u(x). Can you express y via x and u?

Speaking of the first one, consider the case when c is a large negative constant.

So for the first one I COULD re-write it as :

y = xln|d-ln|x|| where d is some arbitrary constant ( I get d after some arithmetic ).

As for the second one, are you hinting that a substitution v(x) = x2y which simplifies to x-2v(x) = y is what I need here?
 
For the first one, I think it should be y = -x ln...

The second one, try :)
 
voko said:
For the first one, I think it should be y = -x ln...

The second one, try :)

For the first one when I integrate and sub back m obvious choice of v = y/x I get :

-e^-y/x = ln|x| + c
e^-y/x = d - ln|x|
-y/x = ln|d - ln|x||
y = -xln|d-ln|x||

I c wut u did thur.

As for the second one I get the answer as : y = ±[itex]\sqrt{\frac{x}{2} + c}[/itex]

I think that's good?
 
I do not think the second result is correct. Please show your steps.
 
  • #10
voko said:
I do not think the second result is correct. Please show your steps.

x2y' + 2xy = 5y3
d/dx [x2y] = 5y3

Substituting v = x2y yields :

dv/dx = 5y3

Also notice that y = vx-2 so :

dv/dx = 5(vx-2)3
dv/dx = 5v3x-6

Separating variables and integrating gives us :

-(1/2v2) = -x-5 + c

Subbing back v = x2y and simplifying :

-(1/2(x2y)2 = -x-5 + c
2x4y2 = x5+c
y2 = x/2 + c/x4
y = ±[itex]\sqrt{\frac{x}{2} + \frac{c}{x^4}}[/itex]

I really should write my steps out haha.
 
  • #11
Zondrina said:
-(1/2(x2y)2 = -x-5 + c

Good so far.

2x4y2 = x5+c

Wrong, both the LHS and the RHS.
 
  • #12
voko said:
Good so far.

Wrong, both the LHS and the RHS.

Oh snap, silly mistake. I should also stop rushing when showing my work.

-(1/2(x2y)2) = -x-5 + c
1/(2x4y2) = x-5 - c
2x4y2 = 1/(x-5-c)
y2 = 1/(2x4(x-5-c))

y = ±[itex]\sqrt{\frac{1}{2x^4(x^{-5}-c)}}[/itex]
 
  • #13
That's better :) To be completely sure, you could try and plug that into the original equation.
 
  • #14
voko said:
That's better :) To be completely sure, you could try and plug that into the original equation.

Yup it works perfectly. Although I DO have a technicality question out of my own curiosity.

Say I was given an initial condition y(x0) = y0.

If y0 > 0, then the solution corresponds to the positive portion of y.

If y0 < 0, then the solution corresponds to the negative portion of y.

Now if y0 = 0, I'm not really sure what happens here? Which solution would I pick or would it never be the case that y0 = 0 because y is discontinuous there regardless of my choice. Seems logical, but some confirmation would be nice.

Thanks for all your help btw :)
 
  • #15
y = 0 is a singular solution in this equation. It corresponds to an infinite c. Note the regular solutions approach it as x goes to zero.
 
  • #16
voko said:
y = 0 is a singular solution in this equation. It corresponds to an infinite c. Note the regular solutions approach it as x goes to zero.

Ahh I see. That makes sense now, thank you.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K