Solving Discriminant Question & Finding Possible Values of k

  • Thread starter Thread starter _Mayday_
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
26 replies · 6K views
_Mayday_
Messages
808
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Discriminant Question

The Equation:

[itex]x^2 + kx + 8 = k[/itex]

has no real roots

(a) Show that [itex]k[/itex] satisfies [itex]k^2 + 4k - 32 (is.smaller.than) 0[/itex]

(b) Hence find the set of possible values of [itex]k[/itex]Attempt

(a) First I will put it in the form:
[itex]ax^2 + bx + c = 0[/itex]
[itex]x^2 + kx + 8 = k[/itex]

a = 1, b = k, c = 8

Now I will put this into the discriminant.

[itex]b^2 - 2ac (is.smaller.than) k[/itex]
[itex]k^2 - 16 (is.smaller.than) k[/itex]

Where do I go from here??

Thanks for any help!_Mayday_
 
Physics news on Phys.org
_Mayday_ said:
(a) First I will put it in the form:
[itex]ax^2 + bx + c = 0[/itex]
[itex]x^2 + kx + 8 = k[/itex]

a = 1, b = k, c = 8
You have said that you were going to put it into canonical form, but haven't done it! Your RHS should be zero.
 
What happens to the k then?
 
:blushing::smile:

[tex]x^2 + kx + 8 - k[/tex]

Ok, but now how do I know which bit is which?

a = 1, b = k, c = 8-k?
 
[tex]b^2 - 2ac[/tex]
[tex]k^2 - 2(8 - k)[/tex]
[tex]k^2 - 16 + 2k = 0[/tex]
[tex]k^2 - 2k = - 16[/tex]

Where do I go from here? I need to prove that the LHS is smaller than 0.
 
Dammit, how embaressing.

[tex]b^2 - 4ac[/tex]
[tex]k^2 - 4(8 - k)[/tex]
[tex]k^2 - 32 + 4k = 0[/tex]
[tex]k^2 + 4k = 32[/tex]
 
_Mayday_ said:
Dammit, how embaressing.

[tex]b^2 - 4ac[/tex]
[tex]k^2 - 4(8 - k)[/tex]
[tex]k^2 - 32 + 4k = 0[/tex]
This line is a good place to stop. Now consider the quadratic equation, what is the condition for there to be real roots?
 
The question says there are no real roots. For there to be real roots the discriminant need to be equal to or larger than 0.
 
The discriminant must be smaller than 0.
 
So then my answer is:

[tex]k^2 - 32 + 4k (smaller.than) 0[/tex]

??
 
Haha what a relief! Never knew > worked!

Now to find possible values I simply factorise?

[tex](k - 4)(k + 8)[/tex]

So the possible values are 4 and -8?
 
_Mayday_ said:
Haha what a relief! Never knew > worked!

Now to find possible values I simply factorise?

[tex](k - 4)(k + 8)[/tex]

So the possible values are 4 and -8?
No these values provide you with the range of an interval. Now you need to decide whether the segment you want (i.e. the set of numbers which yield complex roots) lies within this interval or outside it.
 
Hoot, I got to dash. I'll be back on in an hour or so, see you if you're on. Thanks for your help upto now though!
 
Hootenanny said:
No these values provide you with the range of an interval. Now you need to decide whether the segment you want (i.e. the set of numbers which yield complex roots) lies within this interval or outside it.

Sorry Hoot, I am struggling to understand what that means :confused:
 
If the product is negative, then one needs to be negative.
 
And the other must be positive. Any number that satisfies k- 4> 0 also satisfies k+ 8> 0. Any number that satisfies k+ 8< 0 also satisfies k-4< 0. What numbers satisy k- 4< 0, k+ 8> 0?
 
Last edited by a moderator: