Solving Exponential Equations: e^2x = 5e^3x

  • Thread starter Thread starter cue928
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponential
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the exponential equation e^2x = 5e^3x, focusing on the application of logarithmic properties to manipulate the equation. Participants are exploring the implications of constants within exponential expressions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of natural logarithms and question how to handle the constant "5" in the equation. There are attempts to clarify the rules of logarithms and exponents, with some participants suggesting different manipulations of the equation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on logarithmic rules and clarifying misunderstandings. There is a productive exchange of ideas, although not all participants are fully aligned in their understanding yet.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion regarding the application of logarithmic rules, particularly in relation to constants in the equation. This indicates a need for further clarification on the foundational concepts involved.

cue928
Messages
129
Reaction score
0
e^2x = 5e^3x


I understand that I need to take a natural log of both sides here, what I am thrown about is the constant "5". Can I bring that up as an exponent? So, e^2x = e^(3x)^5?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, not really. That's a rule for logarithms, not for exponents.

However, it's not really a problem. Once you take the natural log of both sides, you just need to remember a different logarithm rule:

[tex]log(ab)=log(a)+log(b)[/tex]

That's all you need here.
 
You might also rewrite this equation, dividing with 5e^2x on both sides:
e^x=1/5
 
Sorry but I don't completely follow. I get that I need to take a natural log of both sides, so are you saying: ln(e^2x) = 5 ln(e^2x)?
 
cue928 said:
Sorry but I don't completely follow. I get that I need to take a natural log of both sides, so are you saying: ln(e^2x) = 5 ln(e^2x)?

No, I'm saying that ln(e^2x)=ln(5e^(3x)). From there, you can use the logarithm rule I posted above to separate the 5.
 
Char. Limit said:
No, I'm saying that ln(e^2x)=ln(5e^(3x)). From there, you can use the logarithm rule I posted above to separate the 5.

Thanks, got it!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K