Solving Feynman Diagrams: Electron-Positron Scattering

  • Thread starter Thread starter physics_fun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diagram
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 3K views
physics_fun
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


Hi, I'm studying Feynman diagrams; electron-positron scattering.
If the 4-momentum of the incoming electron (positron) is p1 (p2) and of the outgoing electron (positron) is p3 (p4), momentum conservation gives
p1 + p2 = p3 + p4

If you now consider the scattering in the frame where the threemomentum of the incoming positron = 0. Why does then defining threemomentum p4=p3 imply that they equal 0?
And why does defining p3*p4=0 (three vectors) imply that p3(threevector)=0 or p4=0?

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried: 4-vectors: p1+p2=p3+p4
square this: (p1)^2 + (p2)^2 + 2*p1*p2= (p3)^2 + (p4)^2 + 2*p3*p4

(p1)^2=(p3)^2=m (electron mass)
(p2)^2=(p4)^2=M (positron mass)

So: p1*p2=p3*p4
The lab frame condition gives:
p1(0)*p2(0)=p3(0)*p4(0)-p3*p4(three-vectors)

But what are the next steps?
(I hope I made clear the problem, it isn't very readable I'm afraid...)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll try a little LATEX to make the problem more clear:

[tex] p_{1} + p_{2} = p_{3} + p_{4}[/tex]
These are four vectors of the in- and going momenta

You take the frame where the threemomentum [tex]p_{2}=0[/tex]

Questions:
1) Why does then defining threemomentum [tex]p_{4}=p_{3}[/tex] imply that [tex]p_{4}=p_{3}=0[/tex]? (threemomenta!)
And why does defining [tex]p_{3}*p_{4}=0[/tex] (three vectors) imply that [tex]p_{3}=0 or p_{4}=0[/tex]?

3. The Attempt at a Solution

I tried: 4-vectors: [tex] p_{1} + p_{2} = p_{3} + p_{4}[/tex]
square this: [tex](p_{1})^(2) + (p_{2})^(2) + 2p_{1}p_{2}= (p_{3})^(2) + (p_{4})^(2) + 2p_{3}p_{4}<br /> //<br /> (p_{1})^(2)=(p_{3})^(2)=m (electron mass)<br /> (p_{2})^(2)=(p_{4})^(2)=M (positron mass)[/tex]
So: [tex]p_{1}p_{2}=p_{3}*p_{4}[/tex]
The lab frame condition gives:
[tex]p_{1}^{0}p_{2}^{0}=p_{3}^{0}p_{4}^{0}-p_{3}*p_{4}(three-vectors)[/tex]

But what are the next steps?
(I hope I made clear the problem, it isn't very readable I'm afraid...)