Solving for Acceleration in a Pulley System

  • Thread starter Thread starter Radarithm
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 7K views
Radarithm
Gold Member
Messages
158
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



A painter of mass M stands on a scaffold of mass m and pulls himself up by two ropes which hang over pulleys, as shown. He pulls each rope with a force F and accelerates upwards with a uniform acceleration a. Find a - neglecting the fact that no one could do this for long.

Homework Equations



[tex]F=M\ddot{y}[/tex]
[tex]\zeta=(M+m)[/tex]
[tex]F=\zeta\ddot{y}[/tex]
For the painter:
[tex]2T-N_1-Mg=M\ddot{y}[/tex]
For the scaffold alone:
[tex]2T-mg-N_2=m\ddot{y}[/tex]
For the entire system:
[tex]T_\Sigma -\zeta g=\zeta\ddot{y}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I have assumed that:
1 - [itex]N_2=Mg[/itex] because of Newton's 3rd Law.
2 - The acceleration of the entire system is [itex]\ddot{y}[/itex].

After solving for numerous equations, I checked the solutions section and got a hint: if [itex]M=m[/itex] then [itex]a=g[/itex]. After plugging in values, I did not get [itex]g[/itex] but instead [itex]2g[/itex] and many other values. My first approach:

Entire system: [itex]T_\Sigma -\zeta g=\zeta\ddot{y}[/itex]
So [tex]T_\Sigma=\zeta(g+\ddot{y})[/tex] and [tex]\ddot{y}=T_\Sigma -g=2F-g[/tex]
For the painter: [itex]2F-N_1-Mg=M\ddot{y}[/itex]. Since [itex]N_1=Mg[/itex], that means that:
[tex]\zeta (g+\ddot{y})=M\ddot{y}[/tex] which leads to: [tex]\ddot{y}(M-\zeta)=\zeta g[/tex]. Solving for the acceleration, we get: [tex]\ddot{y}=\frac{\zeta g}{(M-\zeta)}[/tex].
When I let M and m equal 1, I got twice the acceleration. Where did I go wrong? I had many more attempts but this one seems like the clearest one to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1st, there is a sign mistake in the equation for the painter

2nd, your application of the 3rd law makes no sense. Those forces are not a pair of action and reaction. One is a normal force and the other is a gravitational force. A pair of action and reaction will always have the same nature. Pair normal with normal and gravity with gravity. Also the pair of forces never-ever-ever act on the same object. It's always Object A acts on object B and object B reacts on object A.
 
Radarithm said:
For the painter:
[tex]2T-N_1-Mg=M\ddot{y}[/tex]
For the scaffold alone:
[tex]2T-mg-N_2=m\ddot{y}[/tex]
Isn't ##N_1## the normal force of the scaffold acting on the painter? It should be upward. Also, if ##N_2## is the normal force of the painter on the scaffold, then ##N_1 = N_2##.
I have assumed that:
1 - [itex]N_2=Mg[/itex] because of Newton's 3rd Law.
As noted above, ##N_1 = N_2##, but I don't see why these would be equal to ##Mg## (the weight of the painter). Indeed, if ##M < m## then there won't be any contact force at all.
 
[STRIKE][/STRIKE]I was able to derive a second equation, but I get 6.2 m/s^2:
Painter: [itex]2F+N_1-Mg=M\ddot{y}[/itex]
Scaffold alone: [itex]2F-N_2-mg=m\ddot{y}[/itex]

[tex]N_2=N_1[/tex]
[tex]N_2=2F-m(g-\ddot{y})[/tex]

System itself: [itex]F-\zeta g=\zeta\ddot{y}[/itex]

[tex]T-\zeta g=\zeta\ddot{y}[/tex]
[tex]2F=\zeta (g+\ddot{y})[/tex]

This means that if I plug this into the equation for the painter:
[tex]2\zeta(g+\ddot{y})-g(m-M)=\ddot{y}(M+m)[/tex]
[tex]M\ddot{y}+m\ddot{y}+2\zeta\ddot{y}=g(2\zeta -m-M)[/tex]
[tex]\ddot{y}(M+m+2\zeta)=g(2\zeta -m-M)[/tex]
[tex]g\frac{(2\zeta -m-M)}{(M+m+2\zeta)}[/tex]

The mistake is staring me right in the face. :confused:
 
Radarithm said:
[STRIKE][/STRIKE]I was able to derive a second equation, but I get 6.2 m/s^2:
Painter: [itex]2F+N_1-Mg=M\ddot{y}[/itex]
Scaffold alone: [itex]2F-N_2-mg=m\ddot{y}[/itex]

[tex]N_2=N_1[/tex]
[tex]N_2=2F-m(g-\ddot{y})[/tex]
Already you've made a sign error in that last equation, assuming it is supposed to be a rearrangement of the "scaffold alone" equation above.
 
Also, the equation 2F=ζ(g+y¨) for the whole system is wrong. The left side is off by a factor of 2.
 
So I think this post is dead but I'll give it a shot and try to revive it. I'm sorry if it seems inappropriate but I must also check my answer to this problem

Here is my my analysis:

##2T+N_{scaffold}-M_{parinter}g=M_{painter}a_{painter}##

##2T-N_{painter}-m_{scaffold}g=m_{scaffold}a_{scaffold}##

since ##a_{painter}=a_{scaffold}## and ##N_{painter}=N_{scaffold}## and we can solve for simply ##a## (acceleration of the painter and scaffold) by adding the equations and diving by ##M+m##

##a=\frac{4T-(M+m)g}{M+m}##

Now it turns weird. I can assume by Newton's Third Law that ##F## of the painter should create an equal and opposite tension on the rope, yielding

##a=\frac{4F-(M+m)g}{M+m}##

which agrees with the clue given in the book, but I'm a little hesitant with this since I feel the scaffold (and the painter just by standing on it) must somehow also be affecting the tension.

Any help?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Miles123K