Pulley System on a Big Block: Solving for Acceleration with Zero Applied Force

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the acceleration of mass ##M_1## in a pulley system where no external force is applied (##F = 0##). Participants are analyzing the relationships between the masses and the forces acting on them, particularly focusing on the equations derived from free body diagrams.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the equations governing the motion of the masses, questioning the correctness of specific force equations and their signs. There is an emphasis on ensuring that the net forces and accelerations are accurately represented in the equations.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing examination of the equations presented, with some participants identifying potential errors in the setup and others reflecting on the implications of those errors. Guidance has been offered regarding the signs of forces and the acceleration of the center of mass.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the only external force acting on the system is vertical, which influences their analysis of the forces and accelerations involved. There is also a mention of a diagram that may provide additional context for the discussion.

Buffu
Messages
851
Reaction score
147

Homework Statement



Find the accelaration of ##M_1## in the given system if ##F = 0##.
upload_2017-5-23_17-43-35.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


upload_2017-5-23_17-49-23.png


[/B]
##x_3 -x_1 = k \iff \ddot x_3 = \ddot x_1##

and ##h - y_3 + x_3 - x_2 = l \iff \ddot y_3 + \ddot x_2 = \ddot x_3 \qquad (*)##

h is the height of block ##M_1## and ## l ## is the length of string between ##M_2## and ##M_3##.

Now from the Free body diagram,

upload_2017-5-23_17-43-42.png


##-M\ddot x_1 = N^{\prime \prime \prime}##

##T = M_2 \ddot x_2##

##N^{\prime \prime \prime} = -M_3\ddot x_3##

##\therefore -M\ddot x_1 = M_2 \ddot x_2 - M_3\ddot x_3 \qquad (1)##

Now from vertical force on ##M_3##,

##M_3 - T = -M_3 \ddot y_3##

##-M_3 g + M_2 \ddot x_2 = M_3 \ddot y_3##

Substituting for ##\ddot y_3## in ##(*)##

##\ddot x_3 = x_2 + \dfrac{-M_3 g + M_2 \ddot x_2 }{M_3}##

Solving for ##\ddot x_2##

##x_2 = \dfrac {M_3(\ddot x_3 + g) }{M_3 + M_2}##

Substituting this in ##(1)##

##-M_1 \ddot x_1 = \dfrac {M_3M_2(\ddot x_3 + g) }{M_3 + M_2} - M_3\ddot x_3##

Since ##\ddot x_1 = \ddot x_3##

##-M_1 \ddot x_1 = \dfrac {M_3M_2(\ddot x_1 + g) }{M_3 + M_2} - M_3\ddot x_1##

Solving for ##\ddot x_1##

##\ddot x_1 = \dfrac{-g(M_2M_3)}{M_1M_2 + M_3M_1 - M_3^2}##

Which is incorrect as the given answer is ##\ddot x_1 = \dfrac{-g(M_2M_3)}{M_1M_2 + M_3M_1 \color{red}{ + 2M_2M_3 +} M_3^2}##.

What is the problem ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Buffu said:
Now from vertical force on ##M_3##, ##
M_3 - T = -M_3 \ddot y_3##
This equation doesn't look right.
 
kuruman said:
This equation doesn't look right.
Oh sorry that was a pure typo.
That equation should be,
##M_3g - T = -M\ddot y_3##.
 
Last edited:
Still not right. On the left side (Fnet) "down" is positive, but on the right side (mass x acceleration) "down" is negative.

Also, check equation (1). The center of mass does not accelerate because the only external force to the three mass system is a vertical force. So ##M_1 \ddot{x}_1+M_2 \ddot{x}_2+M_3 \ddot{x}_3=0##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave
kuruman said:
Still not right. On the left side (Fnet) "down" is positive, but on the right side (mass x acceleration) "down" is negative.

Also, check equation (1). The center of mass does not accelerate because the only external force to the three mass system is a vertical force. So ##M_1 \ddot{x}_1+M_2 \ddot{x}_2+M_3 \ddot{x}_3=0##

Yes I got the correct answer, but I think ##M_3g - T = -M\ddot y_3## is correct because ## y_3## is pointing upwards and so is ##\ddot y_3## and therefore I put a negative sign, since ##M_3g - T## is downwards as you said. Am I wrong ?
 
No, it's OK. I fooled myself because I didn't notice ##y_3## in the diagram.
 

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
11K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
20K