Solving for Central Force in $r = c\theta^2$ Orbit

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving for the central force in a specific orbital path described by the equation \( r = c\theta^2 \). Participants are exploring the relationship between the radial equation of motion and the given orbit, focusing on how to derive the force function \( f(r) \) from the provided equations. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and technical explanations related to dynamics in polar coordinates.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Mathematical reasoning, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how to manipulate the equation \( -mf(r)e_r \) and the overall approach to the problem.
  • Another participant outlines the relevant equations, including the central acceleration and the conservation of angular momentum, and prompts for a solution for \( f(r) \) using only \( r \).
  • A different participant shares their struggle with the differentiation process and the substitution \( u = \frac{1}{r} \), indicating difficulty in applying the hint provided.
  • One participant suggests that the substitution might simplify the problem but is not strictly necessary, encouraging the use of a different method that has been discussed.
  • Another participant notes their progress but expresses frustration over discrepancies in their calculations, specifically regarding the coefficients in their derived equations.
  • There is a mention of taking a break to gain a fresh perspective on the problem, highlighting the iterative nature of problem-solving in this context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus on the best approach to solve for \( f(r) \), with multiple methods and interpretations being discussed. The discussion remains unresolved as participants continue to grapple with the mathematical details.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of missing assumptions and unresolved mathematical steps, particularly regarding the differentiation and substitution processes. The dependence on the specific form of the equations and the interpretation of the hint may also affect the clarity of the discussion.

Carla1985
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
Could someone please explain how I work with $-mf(r)e_r$ in this question. Usually we get given an equation (like the one for f(r)) and have to work out the orbit by getting a differential equation etc. I'm not too sure how to work it this way around.

"A particle of mass m moves under the influence of a central force $\textbf{F}(\textbf{r}) =−mf(r)e_r$, in the orbit

$r = c\theta^2$, (1)


where c > 0 and (r, θ) and er , eθ are the polar co-ordinates and corresponding basis vectors in the plane of motion of the particle. Show that:
\[
f(r)=-h^2(\frac{6c}{r^4}+\frac{1}{r^3})
\]
where $r^2\dot{\theta}=h$ is constant



[Hint: Use the substitution $u(\theta)=\frac{1}{r(\theta}$ to write the radial equation $\ddot{r}-r\dot{\theta}^2=-f(r)$ in terms of u(θ), and then determine f using this equation and (1).]"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Carla1985 said:
Could someone please explain how I work with $-mf(r)e_r$ in this question. Usually we get given an equation (like the one for f(r)) and have to work out the orbit by getting a differential equation etc. I'm not too sure how to work it this way around.

"A particle of mass m moves under the influence of a central force $\textbf{F}(\textbf{r}) =−mf(r)e_r$, in the orbit

$r = c\theta^2$, (1)

where c > 0 and (r, θ) and er , eθ are the polar co-ordinates and corresponding basis vectors in the plane of motion of the particle. Show that:
\[
f(r)=-h^2(\frac{6c}{r^4}+\frac{1}{r^3})
\]
where $r^2\dot{\theta}=h$ is constant


[Hint: Use the substitution $u(\theta)=\frac{1}{r(\theta}$ to write the radial equation $\ddot{r}-r\dot{\theta}^2=-f(r)$ in terms of u(θ), and then determine f using this equation and (1).]"

Hi Carla!

Your equations are:

$$\ddot r - r \dot \theta^2=-f(r) \qquad$$ central acceleration
$$r^2\dot \theta = h \qquad\qquad\qquad$$ preservation of angular momentum in a conservative central field
$$r=c\theta^2 \qquad\qquad\qquad$$ the given orbit

Can you solve $f(r)$ from these, expressing it using only $r$?
 
I'm not sure how to do the $\ddot{r}$ part. I rearranged $r=c\dot{\theta}^2$ for theta and subbed that into get
$f(r)=-(\ddot{r}-\frac{h^2}{r^3})$

I differentiated r and got $\dot{r}=2c\theta\dot{\theta}$
and then subbed in theta again: $\frac{2ch\theta}{r^2}$ and then did the same thing again to get $\ddot{r}=\frac{2ch}{r^2}\theta\dot{\theta}=\frac{2ch^2}{r^2}\theta$ which doesn't add up at all.

I think the hint is confusing me too, it says to do a substitution u=1/r which we always do our other questions but I'm not sure where that applies here.
 
The substitution simply makes some of the problem easier to work. But it is not necessary. See if you can finish it the way I like Serena is helping you with. It will help if you if you then want to go back and use the hint.

-Dan
 
Thanks, I am still working on it thought I think I am going to take a break and get some sleep. its past midnight and the kids will have me up at 7am lol. I am so close its frustrating though.
I have $\ddot{r}=\frac{2ch^2\theta}{r^4}$ instead of $\frac{6ch^2}{r^4}$ and I cannot for the life of me see how I get rid of theta and get a 3 instead.

Maybe a fresh look in the morning will tell me where I've gone wrong though hehe.
 
Carla1985 said:
Maybe a fresh look in the morning will tell me where I've gone wrong though hehe.

Well... the morning has passed.
Any new insights? ;)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K