Solving for Coefficient & Acceleration of Two Block System

  • Thread starter Thread starter Filip89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a two-block system where a force is applied to the upper block on a frictionless surface. The objective is to find the coefficient of kinetic friction between the blocks and the acceleration of the lower block while they are in contact.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the coefficient of kinetic friction using the applied force and the force required to accelerate the upper block. They express difficulty in determining the acceleration of the lower block and seek hints for further progress.
  • Some participants suggest drawing a free body diagram for the lower block to analyze the forces acting on it, emphasizing the importance of isolating the block in question.
  • Another participant questions the approach of combining the masses when calculating the acceleration of the lower block, indicating that the applied force does not directly affect it in the free body diagram context.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on the importance of free body diagrams and the correct application of Newton's laws. There is no explicit consensus yet, as various interpretations of the problem are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of force interactions in a two-block system, with specific attention to the role of friction and the correct setup for analyzing the lower block's motion. The original poster's calculations and assumptions are under scrutiny, with suggestions for reevaluation.

Filip89
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 104.0-kg block is on a horizontal frictionless surface, on top of it is a second smaller block of 68.0-kg. A horizontal force F of 613.4 N is applied to the upper block which accelerates with 5.84 m/s2. 1. Find the coefficient of kinetic friction between the two blocks.
2. Find the acceleration of the lower block while the two blocks are in contact.


Homework Equations


F=ma, fk=(coeff kinetic)* F_Normal


The Attempt at a Solution


I found the coefficient of kinetic friction by taking the horizontal force (613.4N) and subtracting from it the force needed to move the block which is F=ma (68.0*5.84). That gave me a fk of 216.28N which I then divided by the normal force (mg= 666.4) to get the coefficient.

I am having trouble finding the acceleration of the bottom block, I thought doing F=ma
(613.3-216.28)=(104+68)a would give me the acceleration but it doesn't. Can someone give me a hint as in what to do because I can't figure it out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In part 1, you looked at the forces acting on the top block. In part 2, you need to draw a free body diagram of the bottom block, and examine the forces acting on the bottom block.
 
Ok, so I add the two masses together (i assume) which gives me 172 kg all together. The horizontal force is still 613.4 N so i set up the equation F=ma 613.4N=(172kg)*a which then gives me an acceleration of 3.566 m/s^2 but that's incorrect.
 
Filip89 said:
Ok, so I add the two masses together (i assume) which gives me 172 kg all together. The horizontal force is still 613.4 N so i set up the equation F=ma 613.4N=(172kg)*a which then gives me an acceleration of 3.566 m/s^2 but that's incorrect.
No, when you take a free body diagram of the lower block, you 'isolate' it by itself and examine the forces acting on it. The 613.4 N force doesn't show up in such a diagram. What does show up is, amongst other forces, is the horizontal friction force from the top block. Use Newton 3 and 2 solve for the acceleration of the lower block. Make sure to use the correct value for the mass when using Newton 2. You shouldn't be adding the 2 masses together using this free body diagram approach.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
61
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K