Solving for Coefficient & Acceleration of Two Block System

  • Thread starter Thread starter Filip89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving for the coefficient of kinetic friction and the acceleration of a two-block system on a frictionless surface. The coefficient of kinetic friction was calculated using the applied force and the force required to move the upper block. However, the user struggled to find the acceleration of the lower block, initially misapplying the total mass in their calculations. Guidance was provided to isolate the lower block and consider only the forces acting on it, emphasizing the importance of using the correct mass for calculations. The correct approach involves applying Newton's laws to the individual blocks rather than combining their masses.
Filip89
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 104.0-kg block is on a horizontal frictionless surface, on top of it is a second smaller block of 68.0-kg. A horizontal force F of 613.4 N is applied to the upper block which accelerates with 5.84 m/s2. 1. Find the coefficient of kinetic friction between the two blocks.
2. Find the acceleration of the lower block while the two blocks are in contact.


Homework Equations


F=ma, fk=(coeff kinetic)* F_Normal


The Attempt at a Solution


I found the coefficient of kinetic friction by taking the horizontal force (613.4N) and subtracting from it the force needed to move the block which is F=ma (68.0*5.84). That gave me a fk of 216.28N which I then divided by the normal force (mg= 666.4) to get the coefficient.

I am having trouble finding the acceleration of the bottom block, I thought doing F=ma
(613.3-216.28)=(104+68)a would give me the acceleration but it doesn't. Can someone give me a hint as in what to do because I can't figure it out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In part 1, you looked at the forces acting on the top block. In part 2, you need to draw a free body diagram of the bottom block, and examine the forces acting on the bottom block.
 
Ok, so I add the two masses together (i assume) which gives me 172 kg all together. The horizontal force is still 613.4 N so i set up the equation F=ma 613.4N=(172kg)*a which then gives me an acceleration of 3.566 m/s^2 but that's incorrect.
 
Filip89 said:
Ok, so I add the two masses together (i assume) which gives me 172 kg all together. The horizontal force is still 613.4 N so i set up the equation F=ma 613.4N=(172kg)*a which then gives me an acceleration of 3.566 m/s^2 but that's incorrect.
No, when you take a free body diagram of the lower block, you 'isolate' it by itself and examine the forces acting on it. The 613.4 N force doesn't show up in such a diagram. What does show up is, amongst other forces, is the horizontal friction force from the top block. Use Newton 3 and 2 solve for the acceleration of the lower block. Make sure to use the correct value for the mass when using Newton 2. You shouldn't be adding the 2 masses together using this free body diagram approach.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top