Calculating Acceleration on an Inclined Plane with Friction | Two Block System

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two blocks sliding down an inclined plane with friction, where the blocks have different masses and coefficients of kinetic friction. The objective is to find the magnitude of the acceleration of the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the necessity of drawing free body diagrams and the implications of action-reaction force pairs. There is consideration of treating the blocks as a single system versus analyzing them separately. Questions arise about the forces exerted between the blocks and how to account for friction.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different approaches to the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the treatment of forces and the importance of correctly applying Newton's third law. There is recognition of the complexity introduced by the differing coefficients of friction.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of determining whether the blocks move together and how that affects the analysis. There is an acknowledgment of the need to check assumptions about the system's behavior before proceeding with calculations.

Arman777
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,163
Reaction score
191

Homework Statement


Two blocks,in contact,slide down an inclined plane ##AC## of inclination ##30^°##,The coefficient of kinetic friction between the ##2.0 kg## block and the incline is ##μ_1=0.20## and that between the ##4.0kg## block and the incline is ##μ_2=0.30##.

Find the magnitude of the acceleration.

Homework Equations


##\vec {F_t }=m\vec a##
##F_f=μN##
##w=mg##

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok I need to draw free body diagram,after that I can solve the question I guess.I stucked in the free body diagram,I don't know its true or not.there's pic in the attached files.

Is there will be any action-reaction force pairs ?
 

Attachments

  • Friction.png
    Friction.png
    12.8 KB · Views: 432
  • Friction  1.png
    Friction 1.png
    48.5 KB · Views: 458
Physics news on Phys.org
If you draw individual free body diagrams, don't forget the forces the blocks exert on each other. (Those would be 3rd law pairs.)

But why not treat the two blocks as a single "system"?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mastermind01
Arman777 said:
Is there will be any action-reaction force pairs ?

When will there be action-reaction pairs? What do you think?
 
Doc Al said:
If you draw individual free body diagrams, don't forget the forces the blocks exert on each other. (Those would be 3rd law pairs.)

But why not treat the two blocks as a single "system"?
They have differenet friction constant and ##N## are different This 2 body diagrams seem simpler ( maybe not but for me yes )

Mastermind01 said:
When will there be action-reaction pairs? What do you think?

If an object exerts a force on something.That something should exert a force on that object

Well,If ##2.0 kg## object exerts a force on ##4.0kg## object. which its I guess, cause there's ##mgsin30## (component of ##2.0kg## block) exerts a force on 4 kg block so there will be action-reaction force pair ? Is it true ? the magnitude of it ? Or the idea ?
 
Arman777 said:
They have different friction constant and N are different I guess.
Sure. So what? (You can include the two friction forces acting on the blocks.)

Arman777 said:
This 2 body diagrams seem simpler ( maybe not but for me yes )
Using separate diagrams is perfectly fine! But then you must include the unknown contact force that the blocks exert on each other.
 
Doc Al said:
Sure. So what? (You can include the two friction forces acting on the blocks.)Using separate diagrams is perfectly fine! But then you must include the unknown contact force that the blocks exert on each other.

I don't know how to think them as a single object..

I want to write down my solution ( I ll add in a minute )
 
Arman777 said:
I don't know how to think them as a single object..
Since they move together, it's easy to treat them as a single system. But you don't have to.

(Think about it: If a single block were sliding down the incline you could -- mentally -- imagine the block divided into two pieces and treat each piece separately. You'll get the same answer as usual, though.)
 
Parallel to inclined plane is x and and the perpendicular to that axis is y.Down is +x and up is +y

##m_2a=m_2gsin(30^°)-μ_2m_2gcos(30^°)+F_{12}##
##m_1a=m_1gsin(30^°)-μ_1m_2gcos(30^°)-F_{21}##

Since
##F_{12}=-F_{21}##

lets subtract them.

##a(m_2-m_1)=gsin(30^°)(m_2-m_1)+gcos(30^°)(m_1μ_!-μ_2m_2)##
 
Doc Al said:
Since they move together, it's easy to treat them as a single system. But you don't have to.

(Think about it: If a single block were sliding down the incline you could -- mentally -- imagine the block divided into two pieces and treat each piece separately. You'll get the same answer as usual, though.)

I guess I understand
 
  • #10
Arman777 said:
Parallel to inclined plane is x and and the perpendicular to that axis is y.Down is +x and up is +y

##m_2a=m_2gsin(30^°)-μ_2m_2gcos(30^°)+F_{12}##
##m_1a=m_1gsin(30^°)-μ_1m_2gcos(30^°)-F_{21}##

Since
##F_{12}=-F_{21}##

lets subtract them.

##a(m_2-m_1)=gsin(30^°)(m_2-m_1)+gcos(30^°)(m_1μ_!-μ_2m_2)##
Careful with signs.

Let's let ##F_{12}## stand for the magnitude of the contact force. In the first equation, it will appear as ##+ F_{12}##; in the second, as ##- F_{12}##.
 
  • #11
Doc Al said:
Careful with signs.

Let's let ##F_{12}## stand for the magnitude of the contact force. In the first equation, it will appear as ##+ F_{12}##; in the second, as ##- F_{12}##.

But ##F_{12}## in the +x direction and ##F_{21}## in the -x direction. that's why there's "-" sign
 
  • #12
Doc Al said:
Since they move together, it's easy to treat them as a single system. But you don't have to.

This approach though only works for this question. I think we should check first whether they do move together?
 
  • #13
Mastermind01 said:
This approach though only works for this question. I think we should check first whether they do move together?
I thought that too but the question asks one acceleration so they must have same acceleration I guess.
 
  • #14
Arman777 said:
But ##F_{12}## in the +x direction and ##F_{21}## in the -x direction. that's why there's "-" sign
You are counting the sign twice, which is why your final equation is incorrect.

What you meant to do was use ##+ F_{12}## in the first equation and ##+ F_{21}## in the second equation. Then, using ##F_{12} = - F_{21}## would work out fine.
 
  • #15
Arman777 said:
I thought that too but the question asks one acceleration so they must have same acceleration I guess.

What you're doing now (along with Doc Al's correction) is correct. For a different question, I think it's better to check first.
 
  • #16
I am writing ##\vec F_{21}=F_{21} (-i)## but actually it is ##\vec F_{21}=F_{12} (-i)## my mistake I couldn't notice this.I solved and answer is correct thanks
 
  • #17
So is it always ##\vec F_{21}=F_{12} (-i)## like this right but always (of course if ##\vec F_{12}=F_{12} (i)##
 
  • #18
I would say it this way: ##\vec{F}_{12} = - \vec{F}_{21}##. The directions are opposite but the magnitudes are equal.

And note that when you combine the two equations correctly, you'll get an equation for the two-block system. (The masses will add.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arman777
  • #19
Doc Al said:
I would say it this way: ##\vec{F}_{12} = - \vec{F}_{21}##. The directions are opposite but the magnitudes are equal.

And note that when you combine the two equations correctly, you'll get an equation for the two-block system. (The masses will add.)

Newtons Third Law yeah...

I noticed two-block system equation when you say right know.Thanks again

Problem solved.I have one more question and I ll open another thread soon If you also help me in that I ll happy
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
688
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K