Solving for constant in a linear combination of vectors

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving for constants in a linear combination of vectors represented by the equation P = c1*V1 + c2*V2, where P, V1, and V2 are equal-sized matrices. The user is attempting to find the steady state of a Markov matrix and has computed the eigenvectors, but struggles with implementing the solution in MATLAB for larger matrices. They explore using inner products to derive a system of equations for the constants c1 and c2, noting that if the vectors are orthonormal, the equations simplify significantly. The user concludes that the system can be solved using matrix inversion, provided the eigenvectors are distinct and not linearly dependent. The discussion highlights the challenges of computational implementation alongside theoretical understanding in linear algebra.
robbondo
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


P = c1*V1 + c2*V2
Where P, V1, and V2, are equal sized matrices


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So what this problem amounts to is me trying to find the steady state of Markov matrix. So I solved for the eigen vectors, and as is my understanding I should be able to solve for my initial condition matrix P as a linear combination of some constant and the eigen vectors. I'm doing this all in MATLAB and I can't seem to figure out how to plug that equation into MATLAB. I know that it should be possible to solve for these constants(C1,C2) by hand, but I'd like to be able to do this for large matrices. Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this matrix P a probability-matrix?
 
yeah... So I figured out that i can make the vectors and the constants into matrices and then use the inverse to solve for C1, etc. but it's not working for some reason. I'm still working on it.
 
One way you can think about it is that your matrices P, V_1 and V_2 are all vectors in \mathbb{R}^{n}.

So we have the equation,

P = c_1 V_1 + c_2 V_2

Taking the inner product of P with the V_i you get a system of equations for the c_{i}.

\langle P,V_1 \rangle = c_1 \langle V_1,V_1 \rangle + c_2 \langle V_2,V_1 \rangle
\langle P,V_2 \rangle = c_1 \langle V_1,V_2 \rangle + c_2 \langle V_2,V_2 \rangle

Further, if your V_i are orthonormal, then the above reduces to,

\langle P,V_i \rangle = c_i

You should be able to solve the above system (A x=b) by left-multiplying both sides by A^{-1} since the only time A would be non-invertible is if \langle V_1,V_1 \rangle \langle V_2,V_2 \rangle = {\langle V_1,V_2 \rangle}^2;that is, if V_1 and V_2 are linearly dependent. However, this is impossible because they are distinct eigenvectors of a matrix.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K