Solving for D in a Confusing Matrix Equation | Invertible Matrices NxN

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter das1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusing Matrix
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the matrix equation ABDB-1 = I for D, where A and B are invertible NxN matrices. The solution is derived by manipulating the equation to find D = B-1A-1B. Additionally, participants explore finding eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a specific 3x3 matrix A, confirming that λ = 1 is an eigenvalue and providing the corresponding eigenvector (0, 3, 2). The characteristic polynomial is also discussed, revealing additional eigenvalues of ±√19.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix operations, specifically matrix multiplication and inversion.
  • Familiarity with eigenvalues and eigenvectors in linear algebra.
  • Knowledge of characteristic polynomials and their role in finding eigenvalues.
  • Proficiency in manipulating matrix equations and determinants.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study matrix inversion techniques and properties of invertible matrices.
  • Learn how to compute eigenvalues and eigenvectors using the characteristic polynomial.
  • Explore advanced matrix factorization methods for solving linear equations.
  • Investigate applications of eigenvalues in systems of differential equations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, matrix theory, and its applications in engineering and physics.

das1
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Solve the equation below for D. Assume that matrices A and B are both invertible and that all matrices are equivalently shaped as NxN (e.g., 3x3 ...).

Equation: ABDB-1 = I
 
Physics news on Phys.org
das said:
Solve the equation below for D. Assume that matrices A and B are both invertible and that all matrices are equivalently shaped as NxN (e.g., 3x3 ...).

Equation: ABDB-1 = I

Your equation doesn't make sense because a matrix minus a scalar has no meaning.
 
Whoops i copied and pasted that. The -1 should be an exponant
 
das said:
Whoops i copied and pasted that. The -1 should be an exponant

Asumming it should read $ABDB^{-1}=I$, post multiply by $B$, then pre multiply by $A^{-1}$ to get $BD=A^{-1}B$ Then pre multiply by $B^{-1}$ to get $D=B^{-1}A^{-1}B$.
 
Fermat said:
Asumming it should read $ABDB^{-1}=I$, post multiply by $B$, then pre multiply by $A^{-1}$ to get $BD=A^{-1}B$ Then pre multiply by $B^{-1}$ to get $D=B^{-1}A^{-1}B$.

Thanks a lot!

If you have a chance, I'm also really confused with this question:

"Show that λ = 1 an eigenvalue of matrix below. In addition, find one corresponding eigenvector.
The 3x3 matrix A is:
4 -2 3
0 -1 3
-1 2 -2
"

I know I'm supposed to find the determinant of the matrix that's λI3- A but I'm totally unable to factor it, i can't find any of the eigenvalues. Is there a quicker/easier way to do this because I keep getting tripped up.
 
das said:
Thanks a lot!

If you have a chance, I'm also really confused with this question:

"Show that λ = 1 an eigenvalue of matrix below. In addition, find one corresponding eigenvector.
The 3x3 matrix A is:
4 -2 3
0 -1 3
-1 2 -2
"

I know I'm supposed to find the determinant of the matrix that's λI3- A but I'm totally unable to factor it, i can't find any of the eigenvalues. Is there a quicker/easier way to do this because I keep getting tripped up.

You have to show that the matrix has a fixed point $(x,y,z)$. If you write that out, you will be find that you need to find a solution to the system $3x-2y+3z=0$, $3z-2y=0$ and $-x+2y-3z=0$. From the second, we get $y=(3/2)z$. Substituting that into either of the two others gives $x=0$. So (0,3,2) is an eigenvector with eigenvalue 1
 
das said:
Thanks a lot!

If you have a chance, I'm also really confused with this question:

"Show that λ = 1 an eigenvalue of matrix below. In addition, find one corresponding eigenvector.
The 3x3 matrix A is:
4 -2 3
0 -1 3
-1 2 -2
"

I know I'm supposed to find the determinant of the matrix that's λI3- A but I'm totally unable to factor it, i can't find any of the eigenvalues. Is there a quicker/easier way to do this because I keep getting tripped up.
One typically uses the characteristic polynomial to FIND eigenvalues. If we already KNOW an eigenvalue $\lambda$, then we find eigenvectors by solving:

$(A - \lambda I)v = 0$.

In this case, that means solving:

$\left(\begin{bmatrix}4&2&-3\\0&-1&3\\-1&2&-2 \end{bmatrix} - \begin{bmatrix}1&0&0\\0&1&0\\0&0&1 \end{bmatrix}\right) \begin{bmatrix}v_1\\v_2\\v_3 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}0\\0\\0 \end{bmatrix}$

or:

$\begin{bmatrix}3&2&-3\\0&-2&3\\-1&2&-3 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}v_1\\v_2\\v_3 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}0\\0\\0 \end{bmatrix}$

or:

$3v_1+2v_2-3v_3 = 0$

$-2v_2+3v_3 = 0$

$-v_1+2v_2-3v_3 = 0$

As in Fermat's post, it is easy to see that $v_2 = \frac{3}{2}v_3$, so that $v_1 = 0$ (by substitution, or just add equations 1 and 2). Letting $v_3 = 2$ gives one possible eigenvector as (0,3,2).

But, let's see (just for grins) what $\det(I - \lambda A)$ works out to be. The matrix in question is:

$\begin{bmatrix}\lambda-4&-2&3\\0&\lambda+1&-3\\1&-2&\lambda+2 \end{bmatrix}$

which has determinant:

$(\lambda-4)(\lambda+1)(\lambda+2) + 6 - 3(\lambda+1) - 6(\lambda-4)$

$= \lambda^3 - \lambda^2 - 10\lambda - 2 - 3\lambda - 3 - 6\lambda + 24$

$= \lambda^3 - \lambda^2 - 19\lambda + 19$

It is not hard to see $\lambda = 1$ is a root, since this leads to: $1 - 1 - 19 + 19 = 0$.

In fact, $\lambda^3 - \lambda^2 - 19\lambda + 19 = (\lambda - 1)(\lambda^2 - 19)$ so we have two other eigenvalues as well: $\pm \sqrt{19}$
 
Deveno said:
One typically uses the characteristic polynomial to FIND eigenvalues. If we already KNOW an eigenvalue $\lambda$, then we find eigenvectors by solving:

$(A - \lambda I)v = 0$.

In this case, that means solving:

$\left(\begin{bmatrix}4&2&-3\\0&-1&3\\-1&2&-2 \end{bmatrix} - \begin{bmatrix}1&0&0\\0&1&0\\0&0&1 \end{bmatrix}\right) \begin{bmatrix}v_1\\v_2\\v_3 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}0\\0\\0 \end{bmatrix}$

or:

$\begin{bmatrix}3&2&-3\\0&-2&3\\-1&2&-3 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}v_1\\v_2\\v_3 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}0\\0\\0 \end{bmatrix}$

or:

$3v_1+2v_2-3v_3 = 0$

$-2v_2+3v_3 = 0$

$-v_1+2v_2-3v_3 = 0$

As in Fermat's post, it is easy to see that $v_2 = \frac{3}{2}v_3$, so that $v_1 = 0$ (by substitution, or just add equations 1 and 2). Letting $v_3 = 2$ gives one possible eigenvector as (0,3,2).

But, let's see (just for grins) what $\det(I - \lambda A)$ works out to be. The matrix in question is:

$\begin{bmatrix}\lambda-4&-2&3\\0&\lambda+1&-3\\1&-2&\lambda+2 \end{bmatrix}$

which has determinant:

$(\lambda-4)(\lambda+1)(\lambda+2) + 6 - 3(\lambda+1) - 6(\lambda-4)$

$= \lambda^3 - \lambda^2 - 10\lambda - 2 - 3\lambda - 3 - 6\lambda + 24$

$= \lambda^3 - \lambda^2 - 19\lambda + 19$

It is not hard to see $\lambda = 1$ is a root, since this leads to: $1 - 1 - 19 + 19 = 0$.

In fact, $\lambda^3 - \lambda^2 - 19\lambda + 19 = (\lambda - 1)(\lambda^2 - 19)$ so we have two other eigenvalues as well: $\pm \sqrt{19}$

This is great, thank you! I was trying to do way more than I needed for this one. That's some impressive factoring too!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K