Solving for Horizontal Projectile Motion: Mechanics Final Question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a mechanics problem involving horizontal projectile motion, specifically focusing on a stone cast from a cliff with an initial horizontal velocity. The problem includes calculating the minimal velocity required to avoid an obstacle, the stone's velocity at a certain point, and the horizontal distance traveled before hitting the ground.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the time it takes for the stone to fall and how it relates to the horizontal distance traveled. There are questions about the correct application of formulas and the presence of negative signs in equations. Some participants express confusion over the formulas used and their derivations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing hints and corrections regarding the formulas. There is an ongoing exploration of the correct setup for the equations, particularly concerning the signs and terms involved in the calculations. Multiple interpretations of the formulas are being examined, and some participants are questioning the validity of the formulas they initially used.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can share. There is a focus on ensuring the correct interpretation of the problem setup and the assumptions regarding the coordinate system.

Femme_physics
Gold Member
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
1
This is one of the questions at the mechanics finals that I skipped.

Homework Statement



http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/1702/mecccs.jpg

In the drawing is described the trajectory of a stone cast from a cliff at point A in an initial horizontal velocity V. During its motion the stone passes close to an obstacle at point B.

A) Calculate the minimal velocity V for the stone not to hit obstacle B
B) Calculate the velocity of the stone at point B (magnitude and direction
C) Calculate the horizontal distance from point A till it hits the ground

The Attempt at a Solution



From some reason I'm getting an error. I think the last formula I used should have an opposite Yi and Yf for it.

http://img683.imageshack.us/img683/2923/anattempt.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
In the first part of your solution, you found out how long the stone took to fall 10 m under the force of gravity. The horizontal distance of 40 m must be traveled by the stone in the same amount of time it fell vertically 10 m.

Here is a great big hint: the horizontal distance traveled by the stone is affected only by the initial velocity. There is no influence from gravity.

Can you find out what the initial horizontal velocity of the stone is in order for it to clear the top of the obstacle?
 
Can you find out what the initial horizontal velocity of the stone is in order for it to clear the top of the obstacle?

Well, yes, it should be in the formula I posted, but from some reason I'm getting an error
 
Hi Fp! :smile:

You introduced a minus sign (sign - not symbol) in your equation that shouldn't be there.

And then you can't take a square root of a negative number.
That will give you an error.
 
Last edited:
You introduce a minus sign (sign - not symbol) in your equation that shouldn't be there.

That's what I'm talking about. Why shouldn't it be there if the equation tells me to just plug in the values? Is there something wrong with it? Because I just copied it straight out of the formula sheet.
 
You seem to have the wrong formula.

For the horizontal motion you should use x_f = x_i + v_x t.

Btw, I don't recognize the formula you used. Where did you get it?
I can't think of any use for that formula.
 
I see.
Yes that would work for horizontal projectile motion.
However, the formula should have delta y on the left side which is positive.
 
Hmm...so it really should be

Delta Vi - delya Yf and not the other way around?
 
  • #10
It should be: y_0 - y or y_i - y_f.

(Btw, this is assuming that the y-axis points upward, which it should.)
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Aha! So, that was my error, or should I say, THEIR error, since I only followed the formula. I daresay I made no mistake here, they did!

Thank you :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
5K