Solving for Invertibility of (B+I) Given B=B^2

  • Thread starter Thread starter transcendency
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on determining the invertibility of the matrix (B+I) given that B satisfies the equation B = B^2. It is established that the determinant of B can be either 0 or 1, influencing the invertibility of (B+I). If det(B) = 1, then B is the identity matrix, making (B+I) invertible. Conversely, if det(B) = 0, it is suggested that B must be a diagonal matrix with eigenvalues of either 0 or 1, leading to uncertainty about the invertibility of (B+I). The conclusion emphasizes the relationship between the eigenvalues and the invertibility of the matrix.
transcendency
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given a matrix B, if B = B2, is (B+I) invertible?

2. The attempt at a solution

det(B) = 0 or 1

rref(rref(B) + I) is I, so (rref(B) + I) is invertible

if det(B) = 1:
let E1E2...En = B
then E1E2...En(rref(B) + I) = B + E1E2...En

I'm not sure if what I did is even useful =(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What can you say about det(B + I)?
 
If det(B) = 1, then B-1B = B-1B2, B = I
so det(B+I) = det(2I) != 0, so B+I is invertible.

I'm still stuck on if det(B) = 0..

I'm quite sure that if B = B2, then B must be a diagonal matrix with entries being either 1 or 0, but I don't know how to prove it.
 
If B= B2 then B2- B= B(B- I)= 0.
 
transcendency said:
I'm quite sure that if B = B2, then B must be a diagonal matrix with entries being either 1 or 0, but I don't know how to prove it.

That follows from the fact you know its minimal poly divides X^2-X, hence you know all the possible eigenvalues (0 and 1), asndyou know the geometric multiplicity is 0 or 1.

Alternatively remember that a definition of an eigenvalue is:t is an eigenvalue of X if and only if X-tI is not invertible.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K