Solving for Normal Force in Vertical Circular Motion Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a pilot performing a loop in a plane, requiring the calculation of the normal force acting on the pilot at the bottom of a vertical circular motion. The context includes concepts from dynamics and circular motion.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on the pilot, including the normal force and gravitational force. There is an exploration of the relationship between these forces and the net force required for circular motion.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided algebraic manipulations to express the normal force in terms of other forces. There is acknowledgment of confusion regarding the correct setup of the equations, with attempts to clarify the definitions of resultant forces and their roles in the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of the problem statement and are questioning the assumptions made about the forces involved. There is a noted discrepancy in the values calculated for the forces, indicating potential misunderstandings in the setup.

Iser
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 76-kg pilot at an air show performs a loop de loop with his plane. At the bottom of the 52-m radius loop, the plane is moving at 48 m/s. Determine the normal force acting upon the pilot.


Homework Equations



(ƩF)R = maR = m(v2/r)

The Attempt at a Solution



I drew a diagram and I know I have to figure it out considering the position of the plane at the bottom of the plane. At the bottom of the plane FR and FN are pointing towards the center of the circle while Fg is pointing the opposite direction. Since the pilot has no movement in the y-direction we know:

FR + FN = Fg

After that I tried putting in the values I have but I got Fg's value was smaller than the total of FR + FN which does not make sense meaning I've made a mistake. I'm confused on how to tackle the problem after this part.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Iser said:
FR + FN = Fg

After that I tried putting in the values I have but I got Fg's value was smaller than the total of FR + FN which does not make sense meaning I've made a mistake. I'm confused on how to tackle the problem after this part.
Only two forces act on the pilot: The upward normal force and the downward gravitational force. Their sum equals the net force, which in this case equals what you call FR.

Show what you got for FR, FN, and Fg.
 
FR is the resultant force, right? And I'm guessing you're taking FR, FN and Fg to be the absolute values. So the equation FR + FN = Fg is not quite right. Remember that the resultant force is not an extra force on its own. The resultant force is the force due to the sum of all other forces.

edit: whoops, Doc Al got there first.
 
Doc Al said:
Only two forces act on the pilot: The upward normal force and the downward gravitational force. Their sum equals the net force, which in this case equals what you call FR.

Show what you got for FR, FN, and Fg.

Oh, ok I sort of see what you're getting at.

So by doing Fnet = FN - Fg

Then we use algebra to make it:

Fnet + Fg = FN

Which is then:

m(v2/r) + mg = FN

I then sub in the values I got from the question arriving to the answer of:

FN = 4112.18 N

Am I on the right track?
 
Iser said:
Oh, ok I sort of see what you're getting at.

So by doing Fnet = FN - Fg

Then we use algebra to make it:

Fnet + Fg = FN

Which is then:

m(v2/r) + mg = FN

I then sub in the values I got from the question arriving to the answer of:

FN = 4112.18 N

Am I on the right track?
Exactly right. :thumbs:

(Now compare that to what the normal force would be at the top of the loop. What's the key difference?)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
811
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K