Solving for the Vertical Distance of a 101 mph Pitch

  • Thread starter Thread starter toothpick09
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pitch Vertical
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the vertical distance a baseball falls when thrown horizontally at 101 mph, specifically from a distance of 60.5 feet. The initial attempt used the formula for time of impact, t impact = 2 * (vo/g) sin theta, but incorrectly mixed units of feet and meters. The correct calculation should maintain consistent units and properly apply the physics of projectile motion to determine the vertical drop due to gravity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of projectile motion principles
  • Familiarity with the formula for time of impact in physics
  • Knowledge of unit conversion between feet and meters
  • Basic grasp of gravitational acceleration (g = 9.8 m/s²)
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the physics of projectile motion and its equations
  • Learn about unit conversion techniques between metric and imperial systems
  • Study the implications of initial velocity on projectile trajectories
  • Explore examples of calculating vertical drop in sports physics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, sports analysts, and anyone interested in the mechanics of baseball pitching and projectile motion calculations.

toothpick09
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



One of the fastest recorded pitches in major-league baseball, thrown by Billy Wagner in 2003, was clocked at 101.0 mi/h (Fig. P3.22). If a pitch were thrown horizontally with this velocity, how far would the ball fall vertically (in feet) by the time it reached home plate, 60.5 ft away?


Homework Equations



t impact = 2 * (vo/g) sin theta


The Attempt at a Solution



2 * (9.21404m (60.5ft)/9.8m/s2) sin(90) = 1.88042 m

1.88042 m * 3.281 ft = 6.16965 ft

what am i doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For one thing, it looks like you are mixing ft and meters. What is the 9.21404 m supposed to be?

Your formula is for "t impact", but you stated the answer in meters?? I think you have confused things. I don't think your formula is correct, either. Can you show how you got it?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K