Solving for v: "Calculating the Speed of Puck After Collision

  • Thread starter Thread starter BadSkittles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision Speed
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the speed of a 0.440kg ice puck after a perfectly elastic collision with a stationary 0.940kg puck. The initial speed of the lighter puck is 3.16m/s, and the user initially calculated the final speed as -2.09m/s, which is incorrect. Participants suggest using distinct symbols for the masses (m1 for the lighter puck and m2 for the heavier puck) and emphasize the importance of applying both conservation of momentum and kinetic energy equations correctly to find the accurate final speeds.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of momentum in elastic collisions
  • Familiarity with kinetic energy equations
  • Basic algebra for solving simultaneous equations
  • Knowledge of vector direction in physics (positive and negative axes)
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of conservation of momentum in elastic collisions
  • Study the derivation of kinetic energy equations for two-body collisions
  • Learn how to set up and solve simultaneous equations in physics problems
  • Explore examples of elastic collisions with varying masses and initial velocities
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of elastic collisions and momentum conservation principles.

BadSkittles
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
A 0.440kg ice puck, moving east with a speed of 3.16m/s, has a head-on collision with a 0.940kg puck initially at rest. Assuming a perfectly elastic collision, what is the speed of the lighter puck? Use east as the positive axis.

I got -2.09.

I made two equations and used substitution to find the speed of the lighter puck. But its wrong. Would appreciate all help.


initial final
1/2mv^2= 1/2 mv^2 + 1/2 mv^2

m(v) = m(v) + m(v)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about distinguishing symbolically between the lighter and the heavier puck? Like, call the lighter m1 and the heavier m2, and same for the velocities.

Rewrite your equations that way and try again. You seem to have the right basic idea.

Hint: there are two solutions to (v1,v2). The second set is physically impossible even though not violating either momentum or energy conservation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K