Solving FT of Decaying Exp: Lorentzian Function

  • Thread starter Thread starter Amok
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the integral of the function involving an exponential decay and oscillation results in a Lorentzian function. The initial approach involves splitting the integral into two parts and evaluating limits, but there is confusion regarding the convergence of the limits due to the oscillatory nature of the complex exponential. Participants clarify that the limits do not exist independently and emphasize the importance of considering the modulus of the function to demonstrate convergence. The conversation highlights the necessity of understanding complex limits and the behavior of functions as they approach infinity. Overall, the thread serves as a valuable exploration of complex analysis and integral calculus.
Amok
Messages
254
Reaction score
1
I had to show that:

\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-a \left | t \right |} e^{\omega t} \mathrm{d} t

with a positive, is equal to a Lorentzian function.

I simply did this:

<br /> <br /> \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-a \left | t \right |} e^{i\omega t} \mathrm{d} t = \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{(-a + i\omega) t} \mathrm{d} t + \int_{-\infty}^{0} e^{(a + i\omega)t } \mathrm{d} t<br /> = \frac{-1}{i\omega\ -a} + \frac{1}{i\omega + a} + \lim_{x \to -\infty} e^{(-a + i\omega )x} - \lim_{y \to +\infty} = \frac{2a}{\omega^2 + a^2} + \lim_{x \to +\infty} e^{-ax} lim_{x \to +\infty} e^{i\omega} - \lim_{y \to -\infty} e^{ax} \lim_{y \to -\infty} e^{i\omega} = \frac{2a}{\omega^2 + a^2}

Is this correct? I'm asking because I've seen people do this by using Euler's formula and then calculating an integral with a cosine in it, but I don't really see the point of that.

EDIT: can you guys see the whole thing? I can't, what should I do?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're fine up to here:

\frac{-1}{i\omega\ -a} + \frac{1}{i\omega + a} + \lim_{t \to \infty} e^{(-a+i\omega)t} - \lim_{t \to -\infty} e^{(a+i\omega)t}

Then you just need to say the two limits are equal to 0.

What you can't do is split the limits up like you did:

\lim_{t \to \infty} e^{(-a+i\omega)t} \Rightarrow \lim_{t \to \infty} e^{-at}\lim_{t \to \infty} e^{i\omega t}

You can only say lim AB = (lim A)(lim B) if both lim A and lim B exist. In this case, the complex exponential oscillates and doesn't converge as t goes to infinity, so the limit doesn't exist.
 
Or, to add a little detail:

|e(-a+iω)t| = |e-at||eiωt| = |e-at| → 0 as t → ∞

and similarly for the other one.
 
vela said:
\lim_{t \to \infty} e^{(-a+i\omega)t} \Rightarrow \lim_{t \to \infty} e^{-at}\lim_{t \to \infty} e^{i\omega t}

You can only say lim AB = (lim A)(lim B) if both lim A and lim B exist. In this case, the complex exponential oscillates and doesn't converge as t goes to infinity, so the limit doesn't exist.

That's what I thought, so how do I show that the limit does exist?
 
Do what LCKurtz did.
 
But how did he introduce the modulus in the calculations?
 
If |z| → 0 then doesn't that show z → 0?
 
Of course it does! Thank you guys.
 
LCKurtz said:
If |z| → 0 then doesn't that show z → 0?

I'm sorry to bring thus up again, but I can see that what you're saying is true, simply by picturing the polar form of a complex number on a complex plane, but how do you prove what you're saying? How can you really write it down?
 
  • #10
Doesn't z → 0 mean |z - 0| gets small?
 
  • #11
It mosta certainly does. The modulus of my function is

\left| e^{-at} \right|

which does become arbitrarily small as t goes to infinity. I hadn't given much though to limits of complex functions for a while. This was good practice. Thank you very much Kurtz.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K