Solving Fuzzy Dice Problem for Acceleration of Car

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsrules
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dice
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the fuzzy dice problem, specifically focusing on determining the acceleration of a car based on the angle of the dice. Participants explore different approaches to resolving the problem, including the use of force components and the implications of choosing different axes for analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the standard approach to the fuzzy dice problem, using the forces in the x and y directions to derive acceleration as a = gtan(theta).
  • Another participant suggests an alternative method by setting the plane with respect to tension (T), leading to a different expression for acceleration as a = gsin(theta), questioning why this approach cannot be used.
  • Some participants agree that both methods can be valid, but they note that the resulting accelerations differ, prompting further discussion on the validity of each approach.
  • There is a discussion about incline plane problems, where one participant notes that the acceleration is often expressed as a = gsin(theta) without additional components, questioning why this differs from the fuzzy dice problem.
  • Another participant explains that in incline problems, the axes are typically aligned with the incline, simplifying the analysis, while in the fuzzy dice problem, the acceleration is horizontal, necessitating the use of components.
  • Participants clarify the role of acceleration in the context of the fuzzy dice problem, discussing how it relates to the forces acting on the dice and the application of Newton's second law.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of the two methods for calculating acceleration, with no consensus reached on which approach is preferable. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of using different axes and the resulting expressions for acceleration.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of axis choice in analyzing forces and acceleration, noting that different setups can lead to different interpretations and results. The discussion also touches on the treatment of components in various scenarios, such as incline problems versus the fuzzy dice problem.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and educators in physics, particularly those interested in force analysis, acceleration, and the application of Newton's laws in different contexts.

physicsrules
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
This is a standard fuzzy dice problem, hung in a car, at angle, theta, and I have to find the acceleration of the car.

I understand the approach used by the prof where he sets the x-y plane relative to mg.
So the sum of forces in the x direction = ma = Tsin(theta)
Similarly, in the y direction, Tcos(theta) = mg; so a = gtan(theta).

However, when I was going over my notes, I was wondering why can't the plane be set with respect to T and split the mg into its components. Therefore T = mgcos(theta) and ma = mgsing(theta). and obtaining a = gsin(theta). Why can't this approach be used to solve for the acceleration of the car.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Seems like a perfectly OK approach to me.
 
thanks for the quick reply but the acceleration is different when i use the two different methods though:
the prof's a : a = gtan(theta)
and my later pondering: a = gsin(theta)
 
Last edited:
physicsrules said:
but the acceleration is different when i use the two different methods though:
the prof's a : a = gtan(theta)
and my later pondering: a = gsin(theta)
Ah... you made an error. (I must not have read it all that carefully. Sorry about that!)

physicsrules said:
However, when I was going over my notes, I was wondering why can't the plane be set with respect to T and split the mg into its components. Therefore T = mgcos(theta) and ma = mgsing(theta). and obtaining a = gsin(theta). Why can't this approach be used to solve for the acceleration of the car.
You can use any axis you want. Don't forget that with the tilted axes, the acceleration will also have components:
mg\sin\theta = ma\cos\theta

Thus a = g \tan\theta for both methods.

And in the other direction (parallel to the string) you have:
T - mg\cos\theta = ma\sin\theta
 
thanks for the fast reply again! however, how is that for incline plane problems, the axes are frequently tilted, yet the acceleration does not have any component attached to it. for example, in a frictionless incline of angle theta, a = gsin(theta). how come do we not see acos(theta) = gsin(theta) for incline problems as well. Thanks!
 
maybe it's because your a is already a component of g? so discounting normal force, there is only one force -Fg- acting on the object on an incline. in your other problem, a is a different force than g.

if I'm wrong, please do correct me
 
physicsrules said:
thanks for the fast reply again! however, how is that for incline plane problems, the axes are frequently tilted, yet the acceleration does not have any component attached to it. for example, in a frictionless incline of angle theta, a = gsin(theta). how come do we not see acos(theta) = gsin(theta) for incline problems as well.
In an incline plane problem, it's much easier to analyze if you have your axis parallel to the plane because the acceleration is parallel to the plane. (In the fuzzy dice problem, the acceleration was horizontal--that's why you needed components if you used a tilted axis.)

If you use a horizontal axis to analyze the incline plane, then you'd need to take components of acceleration and normal force.
 
ok i see it now. so in the incline problem, we are only concerned with the x- component as that's what we take into account for finding velocity and such. Then I'm assuming that the vertical component of acceleration, that we discount, merely brings the block down. Also, in the fuzzy dice problem, we have T - mgcos(theta) = masin(theta). What is the purpose of the a here? What does it do? Is it to lift the dice up, while the x-component is the acceleration that actually moves it horizontally? Thanks for clarifying this!
 
physicsrules said:
ok i see it now. so in the incline problem, we are only concerned with the x- component as that's what we take into account for finding velocity and such.
We are concerned with the component parallel to the plane (the x-component) because the block is constrained to move in that direction.
Then I'm assuming that the vertical component of acceleration, that we discount, merely brings the block down.
We're not discounting anything. The acceleration is fully in the x-direction, so that's all we need. Only if we choose to analyze the problem using vertical and horizontal axes do we have to worry about those components of the acceleration.
Also, in the fuzzy dice problem, we have T - mgcos(theta) = masin(theta). What is the purpose of the a here? What does it do? Is it to lift the dice up, while the x-component is the acceleration that actually moves it horizontally?
The acceleration comes in because we are applying Newton's 2nd law. The sum of the forces in the direction parallel to the string = T - mgcos(theta); we must set that equal to the mass times the component of the acceleration in that direction = masin(theta).
 
  • #10
Thanks for your help, Doc Al.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
13K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K