Solving Gauss's Law Problem: Electric Fields in 4 Regions

  • Thread starter Thread starter awvvu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gauss's law Law
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating electric fields in four regions surrounding an infinitely wide conductor and an infinitely wide plane of charge with surface charge density delta. The electric fields are defined as follows: E_1 = delta / (2 * epsilon_0), E_2 = 0, E_3 = -E_1, and E_4 = delta / (2 * epsilon_0). The Gaussian pillbox method is utilized to derive these fields, confirming that E_4 has half the strength of E_1 and E_3, assuming the conductor is treated as a single plane.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law
  • Familiarity with electric field concepts
  • Knowledge of Gaussian surfaces
  • Basic grasp of surface charge density
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Gauss's Law in different geometries
  • Learn about electric field superposition principles
  • Explore the implications of surface charge density on electric fields
  • Investigate the behavior of electric fields around conductors
USEFUL FOR

Students of electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of electric fields and Gauss's Law applications.

awvvu
Messages
188
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


An infinitely wide conductor (shaded thing on top) is parallel to and at a distance d from an infinitely wide plane of charge (line on bottom) with surface charge density delta. What are the electric fields E_1 to E_4 in the regions 1 to 4?

Code:
1
-------------------------
2  /  /  /  /  /  /  /  /
-------------------------
3
_________________________
4

The Attempt at a Solution


E_2 = 0, as the charges move to the surface.

A Gaussian pillbox that extends a bit out of the conductor has a net flux E A = \delta A / \epsilon_0, and so E = \delta / \epsilon_0. So, E_1 = E and E_3 = -E. I'm getting a little confused about finding E_4. Is it 2E, since there's twice as much flux as there was through a pillbox just above the conductor?

Actually, I'm getting confused about the whole thing. When I have a Gaussian surface that encompasses two different electric fields I want to find, which one am I "getting" when I do the calculations?

Also, is there some way to check this by using superposition or something?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Bump?
 
E1 and E3 at the surfaces? If that's the case you're right, they should be equal but opposite. What do you mean by a Gaussian pillbox? If the coductor is an infinetely wide plane, then what you need to do is construct a gaussian surface surrounding the plane. To do that for a plane that approaches infinite distances, just surround it by two parallel planes of area A that also approach infinite distances:
___________1 (plane)

-------------
////////////// (Conductor)
-------------
___________2 (plane)

In that sense, set E*2A = q/e... dq = (delta)*dA; therefore, E*2A = [(delta)*A]/e, and E = (delta)/2e, in which delta is the surface charge density
 
Last edited:
Gear300 said:
In that sense, set E*2A = q/e... dq = (delta)*dA; therefore, E*2A = [(delta)*A]/e, and E = (delta)/2e, in which delta is the surface charge density

What does that E represent? The region 4? So it has half the field strength as regions 1 and 3?
 
Well...dont know how reliable my answer is, but that's what I'm thinking. I could be wrong if the conductor has two sides with surface charge density...but if its thin enough to be a single plane, it should be alright.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
1K